Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Beer is fine, wine is nice but whisky is the real thing.


Some favourites:


Highland Park - cask strength, dash of water for winter evenings. A 28 year old (I have about two tots left) is just brilliant.


Glenmorangie - lots of cold water - before dinner.


Talisker - 2 parts water, one part whisky while reading good book.


Caol Ila - anytime, anywhere - simply one of the best.


Any many others.


Thoughts please - whisky tastings can be organised if there's sufficient interest.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/
Share on other sites

I have to thank Iain Banks for the whole whiskey thing. I had resisted for so many years, assuming Bells/Teachers were the yardstick


But his book (just a book) Raw Spirit touring all the little distilleries was a revelation - I would recommend it to anyone even half-thinking of taking the plunge

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34678
Share on other sites

I read the same book recently Sean. Although I already enjoyed single malts it spurred me on to try different types.


I never finished it though. About 80% of the way through I got sick of him going on about how all his life consists of is driving around in cool cars, drinking interesting whiskeys and writing. Wanker!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34680
Share on other sites

Partial to a Dalwhinnie, nicely honeyed tones with biscuity bits.


My booze wholesaling and wine expert brother knows a thing or two about whisky. He went on a blind tasting with a bunch of industry bods and Bells came out top overall, so beware. Those blenders know what they're doing.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34681
Share on other sites

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have to thank Iain Banks for the whole whiskey

> thing. I had resisted for so many years, assuming

> Bells/Teachers were the yardstick

>

> But his book (just a book) Raw Spirit touring all

> the little distilleries was a revelation - I would

> recommend it to anyone even half-thinking of

> taking the plunge


Good book but I found the political views, which were not to my taste, made me drink more. However, his stance on whisky is sound.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34696
Share on other sites

spadetownboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you cant beat a black bush.


Doesn't count - not Scotch!!


Rum matured Glemorangie I haven't tried but the Havana Rum barrel matured Glenfiddich was a revelation - a drinkable Glenfiddich.


Has anyone tried the Scotch Malt Whisky Society - I can recommend it as a present (remind wife / partner about 6 weeks before birthday / Christmas - that's what I did)


Scotch Malt Whisky Society


Good for single cask, cask strength malt whiskies with unique rather than blended flavours.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34698
Share on other sites

spadetownboy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> where does it say anywhere on this thread that its

> limited to scotch whiskey, nowhere that i can

> see,therefore black bush qualifies,certainly

> knocks the spots off some of the crap mentioned

> already.


Well, without wanting to sound pedantic if you look at the title of the thread it says "Malt Whiskies". That's whisky, and malt whisky at that, not whiskey, huge difference.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34747
Share on other sites

Wikipedia said this to me: Single malt whisky is a whisky which is distilled at a single distillery, and which is made completely from a single type of malted grain, traditionally barley, (although there are also single malt rye whiskies).


In which case Black Bush qualifies.


Or if we were to take it literally merely saying ?Malt Whisky? would incorporate all whiskies as they are all made with malt.


Although as a modern colloquialism the term ?Malt Whisky? generally implies Single Malt Scotch Whisky.


The argument of colloquial meaning or literal meaning is one that I?m sure there must be some type of legal precedent for. When a judge is asked to determine what the original terms of a verbal contract were there must be some type of test they apply when this problem crops up.


This point is deeply significant for those who would like their partners to buy them the correct type of whisky for Christmas. It must be sorted out before this


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/6919503.stm


goes on the market and throws another spanner in the works.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34761
Share on other sites

Ahem! It's all in the spelling, Whisky being Scottish and Whiskey being from anywhere else. A Scottish Malt Whisky is completely different in taste and texture as well to things like Bushmills, Black Bush, Paddy or sour mash whiskey/bourbon whiskey. And if you look at Mamora Man's original posting he only mentions the Scottish ones and also only uses the Scottish spelling, without an E. So there you go.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34858
Share on other sites

May I join in? I like virtually all whisky but if I had to choose: Oban is nice as a good honest drinker. A Port Ellen will give you a peppery, smoky, peaty good time. A Longrow (from Springbank on Kintyre) or Springbank's 21 year old are heavenly, special treat malts.


Just enough water to release the flavour and on you go.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1291-malt-whiskies/#findComment-34868
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...