Jump to content

Recommended Posts

And I'll set Pete on you..


http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/4d30b7cb78054722b2a3aafb922d38eb/pete-the-royal-liberty-morris-fool-at-the-sweeps-festival-bkt73k.jpg


Courtesy of Royal Liberty Morris. Yes, They dance with Scaffold Poles and they are a Mixed Side.


Foxy

Alpy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> We went there on Saturday night, I couldn't fault

> it. I had a lovely steak and my wife couldn't

> finish a very generous portion of Johnnies Chicken

> Special! Nice selection of wine as well. Highly

> recommended! Definitely will be back!


& AdaDulwich


>I would like to highly recommend Johnnie's restaurants. Very good food, nice atmosphere, clean and great service. >Great place for a family dinner! Also the millshake was sooo yummy ;) Thank you.





Maybe, just maybe, they are genuine, but as has proved in the past, they're often constructed by well meaning but misguided 'friends' of establishments. Often by people who think that the anonymity of the internet will be enough.

However, if you look at the style and punctuation of these two posts above, you'll see quite obvious similarities.

I am sorry but I am not sure what is your intention to write those comments...I thought that we should say something about the restaurant than about people and their language. If you would like to know... that is not my first post but I don't think this is important. And I don't think that we all have to speak perfect English to be able make comments about the restaurant.

AdaDulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I am sorry but I am not sure what is your

> intention to write those comments...I thought that

> we should say something about the restaurant than

> about people and their language. If you would like

> to know... that is not my first post but I don't

> think this is important. And I don't think that we

> all have to speak perfect English to be able make

> comments about the restaurant.


Ok, I apologise if it's not the case.


Sorry, tho I did say 'maybe'


I've edited out part of the comment

AdaDulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

. If you would like

> to know... that is not my first post but I don't

> think this is important.



If you click on your name, all the posts you have made come up (two), and your first post on this thread is showing as your first post on the forum.


ETA: It also shows that you registered on the forum the day of your first post, which was 21 February.

To be fair, Sue, these two posts are the first and only posts by AdaDulwich, which is not to say the real originator hasn't got other aliases and posts. Probably only Admin would know (and not even Admin if the originator also has multiple e-mail addresses).

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AdaDulwich Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> . If you would like

> > to know... that is not my first post but I

> don't

> > think this is important.

>

>

> If you click on your name, all the posts you have

> made come up (two), and your first post on this

> thread is showing as your first post on the

> forum.

>

> ETA: It also shows that you registered on the

> forum the day of your first post, which was 21

> February.



Indeed and like I said, the post style and the punctuation look similar.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair, Sue, these two posts are the first and

> only posts by AdaDulwich, which is not to say the

> real originator hasn't got other aliases and

> posts. Probably only Admin would know (and not

> even Admin if the originator also has multiple

> e-mail addresses).


AdaDulwich could post back here to assuage our misplaced cynicism and unwarranted suspicion?

I am sorry but I don't know who the person is who wrote the other post. To be honest I don't care... I went to the restaurant and wrote a comment. I don't have to explain myself, how many emails I have or post I did..it's only my business. If you don't like my comment just skip it and enjoy the rest of the day (sunny day 😉) Have a nice day.

If you are looking for help to reduce costs in your restaurant regarding IT software, Energy savings, Security we could arrange a meeting to work out how I can save you money in the long run


Why Datapact?


We are based in Holborn, Central London. This makes servicing our clients within the capital very straightforward, as we are never more than 30 minutes away.


When you switch to Datapact, we will take time to learn your business, and explore your current systems, so that in the event of any issues, we already know how it can be solved, ensuring that you are back up and running as quickly as possible.


By working with Datapact, you can ensure that your IT infrastructure is totally supported, resilient and reliable.


You will get no hard sell from Datapact, just honest and reliable advice and service.


A major advantage which we have over our competitors is that when you speak to Datapact, you will hear a voice who you know and trust, and who knows your business inside out.


We also pride ourselves on our relationship with Schools in London, as we provide IT support for a number of schools and colleges in London.


Small to Medium sized organisations


If you are part of an small to medium size business, then our scalable solutions can help you to grow your business at a pace that suits you, without staling your growth through large IT bills.


Our cloud solutions are made with you in mind, through solutions such as Office 365 and cloud hosted telephony, we can build an IT infrastructure that suits your business.


With monthly payments, so you know exactly where you stand each month, we can take the hardware and infrastructure away from your office, saving you space, keeping your business secure, and reducing your energy bills.


See more about our Cloud services


Corporate clients


Since forming in 1990, we have had the pleasure in working with a multitude of large UK and global corportations, including CBRE, Rabobank and UPS.


Our flexible finance terms and next day delivery demonstrate that when you work with Datapact, you are partnering with reliable partner who will constantly meet your requirements.



Message from our Managing Director


?When I formed Datapact in 1990, I did so with one clear intention, to use IT to help our clients grow. IT is a powerful tool, not because of the size of the operating systems or processors which modern computers possess, but because of the impact which IT can have on a enterprise.


Whether it be a school using the best technology to encourage students to interact and learn, or a financial trader using the fastest technology to clinch an important deal, the role of IT in a business can often be underestimated.


We have always worked closely with our clients, and will continue to do so, in order to ensure that we fully understand their needs, and by understanding how their business works, and what they need from a IT provider, we can ensure that we consistently exceed their targets.


As we move forward into 2016, these initial intentions are more important than ever, and by working with Datapact, you are working with a company who you can trust to put the growth and development of your business at the top of their agenda.?


Paul Yudt, Datapact (London) Ltd Managing Director


Range of Consumables


With next day delivery available on an extensive variety of products, you can have confidence that Datapact can supply your business with the necessary equipment to thrive. To discover whether we can accommodate for your requirements, please state, with as much detail as possible, your requests in this simple form, and we will be able to provide a full quotation within 24 working hours.

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> To be fair, Sue, these two posts are the first and

> only posts by AdaDulwich, which is not to say the

> real originator hasn't got other aliases and

> posts. Probably only Admin would know (and not

> even Admin if the originator also has multiple

> e-mail addresses).


If a person deliberately uses mutli-email addresses to avoid detection, they will still have the same IP address if they are posting from the same location, something I believe Admin can check unless the user has an IP blocking device. Another way round this is to post from different locations, e.g. home, work, coffee shop etc...

Sausage quality notwithstanding I do, just very occasionally, after having weaved around the sodding thing three or four times in a day, feel the urge to attack their huge A-board with a sledge hammer.


Maybe I should put that on Tripadvisor?

Dogkennelhillbilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or, you know, go in and speak to them about it. Or

> complain to the council.


Don't be idiotic. If I were to waste my time responding in person to every little annoyance LL offers rather than letting it fester and ferment until it sparks violent rage fantasies I'd have nothing to write about on here. You really are new at this aren't you?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...