Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was wondering if anyone has any experience of the small claims court? I put my son in a nursery in September but after 4 sessions it became clear it was not working out and the manager suggested I take him out and they would refund the remaining fees. I have 2 emails from her in which she agrees to refund the money however now she is refusing and saying we signed a contract which states the fees are non refundable. Does the fact she agreed to the refund initially over ride the contract?
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/130437-small-claims-court/
Share on other sites

I'm willing to stand corrected by a qualified person, which I'm not, but I'd say unfortunately a signed contract trumps any non-witnessed undertaking she might have made (unless you have an email saying take him out and we'll refund? It sounds like her emails came after though). You might have a case in small claims if you can demonstrate that some deficiency on their part made it unconscionable for you to leave your son there, but otherwise I fear they have the upper hand.
Oh, well if that's the case maybe you have got a good case - like I said, I'm no expert. It would depend on whether an agreement to refund money constitutes a contract, wouldn't it, rather than an offer - I wouldn't have thought it was as cut and dried as that. Small claims court is interesting - went this year and won against Aspect plumbers for an incompetent job - but bear in mind you have to pay fees (I think it was about ?110) which you won't get back if you lose, and the defendants may be able to claim for expenses incurred as a result of the claim.

> but bear in mind you have to pay fees (I think it was about ?110)


The fees do vary with amount claimed: https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money/court-fees.


Do you perhaps not have an agreed variation of contract? What you describe suggests that you have agreed to forgo the future sessions, and the nursery has agreed to forgo the fee, and confirmed so in writing.

Eg: http://www.out-law.com/en/topics/projects--construction/construction-contracts/variations-to-contracts-and-changes-in-the-law/

http://consumerhub.eversheds.com/specialism/how-effective-are-variation-clauses-in-your-contracts/

Speak to your local trading standards Office (you will probably be referred to Citizens Advice). It may be that the nursury has a history already.


Check out your position on unfair contracts - https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/cma-consumer-enforcement-guidance. For something as personal as looking after your children surely they cannot demand such inflexible arrangements. Nurseries could be classed as a distress purchase where the power may be with the seller.


Write, preferably old school and recorded delivery with a reasonable request but say that if you don't get satisfaction that you will to to the County Court. Refer to the e-mails.


You may suggest a compromise of alternative dispute resolution http://www.tradingstandards.uk/advice/AlternativeDisputeResolution.cfm which will then make you come across as being reasonable if you go further.


Small Claims Court is set up to be (relatively) low cost and easy to use. I've been through it a few times. Problem can be enforcement, particularly individuals, where bills can mount up.


Whilst you don't want expensive legal advice the nursery is likely to want to avoid it too.

Thank you for the advice. I'm going to write a pre-action letter to them and send it via email and also send it to the nursery, the registered address of the company, and to the home address of the 2 directors. Will probably hand deliver to the nursery as it's only down the road and then they can't claim non-receipt.


I will list the reasons both sides decided that we couldn't continue to use the nursery - giving a bowl of coco-pops as a snack instead of fruit like they said they would and putting my sons nappy on so tight he was crying in pain - as well as pointing out that they already agreed to the refund. Hopefully that will do the trick and we can avoid court.

The reasons you give for withdrawing your boy mean you have a case for non-provision of agreed services so breach of contract - I'd suggest, as they did these things, you have a case for refund of all fees paid, not just the unexpired portion. I meant to add to previous, when I went to small claims I found the judge to have one of the sharpest minds I've ever come across (and my barrister sister tells me this is very common) - if you have a good case s/he'll cut through any bluster and see the facts. Good luck!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • And from what I remember, she eventually cut the tea shop for a similar  reason to chandelier.  Chariot style buggies
    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...