Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Do you think the lovely Mic could teach my dog to read the "No dogs" signs on Goose Green?


I'm looking after a Doberman (surely right up his street) and the last three times I've walked him on the Green, the gate to the dog-free section has been left open and he's nipped straight in there. While getting him out toot sweet (sic) surely it is incumbent on the users to close the gate after themselves?

Sorry - that last post was way too serious.


To lighten the thread, perhaps Mic could branch out into dog fashions - will do loads for his image:


http://whatnottocrochet.wordpress.com/ (see 21 July entry)


[sorry am Luddite who knows not how to post url]

While Mic is rather an idiot... Pit bulls do get a rather bad rap in the press. Very few reported incidents actually involve pit bulls. The reporting might be a bit different on this side of the pond though, I'm still new here! They can certainly be dangerous dogs, but can also be fabulous pets.

I'm shocked you lot don't all like my hero MM!


I think all the hardnuts should get the pansies out of power, cos they've had it for ages and don't seem to know what to do with it, other than sell it to the highest bidder.


I've got a scary dog, and he's great.

Mockney - so do poncy, unsporty, bullied dictators like Blair, Hiltler and Stalin!


I think the way I look at it is, that in the past, when these people did not have technology to back them up, they would have been bottom of the pack, but now they are running the world! Scary stuff!

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the way I look at it is, that in the past,

> when these people did not have technology to back

> them up, they would have been bottom of the pack


Bring back/dig up Oliver Cromwell! Now there was a man who was prepared to put his sword where his mouth was.

I'm not big on hierarchical leaders. I think we all need to become leaders, instead of allowing these deeply flawed unnatural leaders to be running the planet.


Power to the people, especially us Chavs, who outnumber the poncy unsporty types, but can't be arsed running anything much (at the moment!).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...