Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Do you think the lovely Mic could teach my dog to read the "No dogs" signs on Goose Green?


I'm looking after a Doberman (surely right up his street) and the last three times I've walked him on the Green, the gate to the dog-free section has been left open and he's nipped straight in there. While getting him out toot sweet (sic) surely it is incumbent on the users to close the gate after themselves?

Sorry - that last post was way too serious.


To lighten the thread, perhaps Mic could branch out into dog fashions - will do loads for his image:


http://whatnottocrochet.wordpress.com/ (see 21 July entry)


[sorry am Luddite who knows not how to post url]

While Mic is rather an idiot... Pit bulls do get a rather bad rap in the press. Very few reported incidents actually involve pit bulls. The reporting might be a bit different on this side of the pond though, I'm still new here! They can certainly be dangerous dogs, but can also be fabulous pets.

I'm shocked you lot don't all like my hero MM!


I think all the hardnuts should get the pansies out of power, cos they've had it for ages and don't seem to know what to do with it, other than sell it to the highest bidder.


I've got a scary dog, and he's great.

Mockney - so do poncy, unsporty, bullied dictators like Blair, Hiltler and Stalin!


I think the way I look at it is, that in the past, when these people did not have technology to back them up, they would have been bottom of the pack, but now they are running the world! Scary stuff!

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the way I look at it is, that in the past,

> when these people did not have technology to back

> them up, they would have been bottom of the pack


Bring back/dig up Oliver Cromwell! Now there was a man who was prepared to put his sword where his mouth was.

I'm not big on hierarchical leaders. I think we all need to become leaders, instead of allowing these deeply flawed unnatural leaders to be running the planet.


Power to the people, especially us Chavs, who outnumber the poncy unsporty types, but can't be arsed running anything much (at the moment!).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Andy is an absolute star. Have used him for years and he’s become a hugely trusted and valued friend as well as handyman. Always willing to go the extra mile and doesn’t cut corners, but great on pricing. Can’t recommend enough.
    • Surely you are still covered under these circumstances even if you don't have the physical licence? I can't believe you would be prevented from driving? That would be a ridiculous system. I don't recall any delays   when mine was renewed. Why would their medical department be involved if you have no medical issues? Could someone have made some admin mistake somewhere along the line?
    • Does anyone have the same problem.  I am 79 and have sent my licence renewal form to the DVLA on the 21st October 20 which they have received. I have just received a letter from them them dated 22 December 2025 today saying my licence is with their Drivers Medal Department and will be processed as soon as possible. This follows my telephone call to them after three weeks  from the October date as I had not received my licence back as per their time frame. I also followed this up mid December after finally getting through but did not get any confirmation as to what the situation was. Is this normal practice? On the 7 January 2026 I will be unable to drive as my licence has not been sent back. I have no medical issues and meet all the requirements with no problem as per previous renewals in fact nothing has changed health wise.Their the letter states if they need any more details from me, they will contact me directly. Why has it taken 2 and a half months get get this far? Is this some sort of ploy to get older drivers to finally give up their driving by making life difficult as possible.  Has anyone else experienced this. Read Medical not Medal.
    • You're being a little disingenuous here. It is simply not true that "the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum" because: -> the area the development is in isn't 2/3 storeys maximum today - as evidenced by the school on the lot adjoining the development to the south, as well as the similarly-sized buildings to the north and east.  -> the SPG doesn't preclude this type of development anyway. This "genie in a bottle" stuff is desperate barrel-scraping. Now you're raising the spectre of a 9 storey building on the Gibbs & Dandy site (the chance would be a fine thing) but also arguing Southwark is too slow to approve things and opposed to development more than 2-3 storeys!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...