Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just a word of warning in case the important looking letter is from a Court or bailiffs.


We have a (very tedious) ongoing battle with a firm of bailiffs who are trying to collect a significant Court fine from someone who gave a fake address (ours) to the Police or Court.


They know he doesn't live at our house and they have no right to enter our home, but that doesn't stop them from turning up and threatening to do so on a regular basis.


So, I would definitely return the letter (unopened, if there's a return address) to sender with a clear letter from you saying you've not heard of this person and he doesn't live at your house, and keep a copy of it.

I would second that. We had a problem some years ago when a woman decided to use our address every time she got caught not paying her train fare. We had endless letters. There was no return address so after a couple of 'please return to senders' I finally opened one to find out what they were - purely for the purpose of getting it sent to the right person - just in time, as we would have had a visit from the bailiffs shortly afterwards. I rang up the train company to explain and we never got another one.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
    • That petition is bananas.   If you want a youth centre there pay the landlord the same rent a Londis would and build it yourself or shut the f**k up to be honest. Wasting our MPs time with this trivial nonsense is appalling. If your kids are still out at 1am on a school night you've got bigger problems than vapes and booze and hot sausage rolls. 
    • There used to be a better baker than Gail's on the same site immediately before Gail's pulled their financial muscle.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...