Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's really hard to know when phrases are offensive to some. A colleague once used the phrase 'a statement of the bleeding obvious', which I'd heard often and thought vaguely was a Monty Python reference (no idea if that's the case!). Anyway another colleague got very upset, said it was offensive and sacriligous and forced the original guy to apologise. Genuinely didn't know some people could find it offensive (still don't really know why), likewise the Irish twins phrase (ditto). Sorry to go off-topic.

Totally agree with you Belle and Candj


I had never heard the term before but guessed that it meant siblings born of the same mother close together.


It was only when one person took offence that I googled the term as I was perplexed how it was offensive. Even having found the derogatory meaning that had been used historically, I do still think this term (and thousands of others commonly used) are only offensive if used in an offensive manner.


Problem with an online forum is it's the written word rather than spoken so it is how the reader interprets the written word rather than how the writer means it.


yep, this is going off thread rather..... back on thread, 4 days...... No way!!!

I didn't interpret the word as offensively meant, I get the context, I didn't think Candj was directing it deliberately at anyone, nor was I offended by it. I just wanted to point out it's a derogatory term, so you could perhaps not persist in using it or introduce anyone else to it as a valid term. You know, so someone wouldn't actually be offended in real life, because it probably would be better to say something else instead - so why anyone would insist on your right to use it is beyond me.


Lots of terms are offensive whether said with malice or affection. Talking about Irish twins is fricking rude whether you meant it rudely or not. It really is simple. It makes no difference whether you mean something to offend, or whether you say it in jest, or whether you say it affectionately, or whether you heard your friend who IS that word use it about themselves, or whatever. If the term is (in this case CLEARLY) rooted in ignorance and derision, it is just unnecessary to use it. Pretty easy to say "gosh, now you mention it, yeah" and then use something else instead in future. You know, like "oh same-year siblings".


It blows my mind that people would rather defend their right to use terms in ignorance, and now in full knowledge of their roots, rather than say thanks for pointing it out. It's the same logic that has words like Gippo, Paki and more still hanging around, still offending people, still invoking cries of "but it wasn't meant like that..." while people defend their right to offend. Crying "pc gone mad" is ridiculous - it's politeness, good manners, to show willing to talk about people in terms that don't belittle them.

Back on topic- I had a friend at work who's sister had a baby in hospital. The next day her husband was told off by the midwife for trying to get into the hospital bed with her for some 'special' time!!! So that beats the 4 day shocker!


Each to their own I guess but honestly I couldn't fathom it for many months and luckily my OH is very understanding

I'd never heard of the term Irish Twins. It clearly has derogatory roots. But the term seems to have passed into common and non-offensive useage to the extent it has become the name of a website offering support to people with children born within a year, also a book and a film. So not at all like gippo and paki, which remain offensive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s about chains, and the ethos of family run business versus unhealthy competition 
    • 'Tom Lehrer, acclaimed musical satirist of cold war era, dies aged 97' https://www.theguardian.com/music/2025/jul/28/tom-lehrer-dies-aged-97-dead-musical-satirist  
    • But all those examples sell a wide variety of things,  and mostly they are well spread out along Lordship Lane. These two shops both sell one very specific thing, albeit in different flavours, and are just across the road from each other. I don't think you can compare the distribution of shops in Roman times to the distribution of shops in Lordship Lane in the twenty first century. Well, you can, but it doesn't feel very appropriate. Haa anybody asked the first shop how they feel? Are they happy about the "healthy competition" ?
    • ED is included in the 17 August closure set (or just possibly 15 August, depending on which part of the page you trust more) listed at https://metro.co.uk/2025/07/25/full-list-25-poundland-stores-confirmed-close-august-23753048/. Here incidentally are some snippets from their annual reports, at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/02495645/filing-history. 2022: " during the period we opened 41 stores and closed 43 loss-making/under-performing stores.  At the period-end we were trading from 821 stores in the UK, IoM and ROI. ... "We renogotiated 82 leases in the year, saving on average 45% versus the prior lease agreement..." 2023: "We also continued to improve our market footprint through sourcing better store locations, opening 53 and closing 51 stores during the year." 2024:  "The ex-Wilco stores acquired in the prior year have formed a core part of this strategy to expand our store network.  We favour quality over quantity and during the period we opened 84 stores and closed 71 loss-making/under-performing ones."
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...