Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's really hard to know when phrases are offensive to some. A colleague once used the phrase 'a statement of the bleeding obvious', which I'd heard often and thought vaguely was a Monty Python reference (no idea if that's the case!). Anyway another colleague got very upset, said it was offensive and sacriligous and forced the original guy to apologise. Genuinely didn't know some people could find it offensive (still don't really know why), likewise the Irish twins phrase (ditto). Sorry to go off-topic.

Totally agree with you Belle and Candj


I had never heard the term before but guessed that it meant siblings born of the same mother close together.


It was only when one person took offence that I googled the term as I was perplexed how it was offensive. Even having found the derogatory meaning that had been used historically, I do still think this term (and thousands of others commonly used) are only offensive if used in an offensive manner.


Problem with an online forum is it's the written word rather than spoken so it is how the reader interprets the written word rather than how the writer means it.


yep, this is going off thread rather..... back on thread, 4 days...... No way!!!

I didn't interpret the word as offensively meant, I get the context, I didn't think Candj was directing it deliberately at anyone, nor was I offended by it. I just wanted to point out it's a derogatory term, so you could perhaps not persist in using it or introduce anyone else to it as a valid term. You know, so someone wouldn't actually be offended in real life, because it probably would be better to say something else instead - so why anyone would insist on your right to use it is beyond me.


Lots of terms are offensive whether said with malice or affection. Talking about Irish twins is fricking rude whether you meant it rudely or not. It really is simple. It makes no difference whether you mean something to offend, or whether you say it in jest, or whether you say it affectionately, or whether you heard your friend who IS that word use it about themselves, or whatever. If the term is (in this case CLEARLY) rooted in ignorance and derision, it is just unnecessary to use it. Pretty easy to say "gosh, now you mention it, yeah" and then use something else instead in future. You know, like "oh same-year siblings".


It blows my mind that people would rather defend their right to use terms in ignorance, and now in full knowledge of their roots, rather than say thanks for pointing it out. It's the same logic that has words like Gippo, Paki and more still hanging around, still offending people, still invoking cries of "but it wasn't meant like that..." while people defend their right to offend. Crying "pc gone mad" is ridiculous - it's politeness, good manners, to show willing to talk about people in terms that don't belittle them.

Back on topic- I had a friend at work who's sister had a baby in hospital. The next day her husband was told off by the midwife for trying to get into the hospital bed with her for some 'special' time!!! So that beats the 4 day shocker!


Each to their own I guess but honestly I couldn't fathom it for many months and luckily my OH is very understanding

I'd never heard of the term Irish Twins. It clearly has derogatory roots. But the term seems to have passed into common and non-offensive useage to the extent it has become the name of a website offering support to people with children born within a year, also a book and a film. So not at all like gippo and paki, which remain offensive.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Moving into a new place and need both a wardrobe and a chest of drawers, ideally collection Friday. Thanks!
    • Lordship Lane has two dry cleaners, three pizza places and an Italian selling pizza, two burger places, three bakeries, two hardware (ish, I'm thinking AJ Farmer here), God knows how many coffee and charity shops, two Italians, three nail salons, five wine shops... Where was the abject outrage when Dynamic Vines opened up literally next door to Cave de Bruno? But I don't see his customers decamped next door - no, those stalwarts are still out in force every night.  In Roman times all businesses were clustered by product. It's what kept prices down. Same in any market you go to abroad, they're all selling the same things next to each other.  Why is everyone being so hard on this new place? It's called healthy competition - you can't curtail the expansion of your business on the basis you that might hurt someone else's. 
    • I have a new fixation so any available, please let me know.  Thanks.
    • In restaurant terms I would say a chain manifests when the motivation is no longer “we are a couple/small group who have an idea and love food” who open a restaurant, them another and then a few more BUT THEN PIVOT to “we need capital to rollout out new restaurants so we have leveraged the help of the following investors”  that is the moment it stops being about the chef/food on the plate and becomes about the spreadsheet  so it is POSSIBLE  for a restaurant to have 50 branches and not be a chain - but I can’t think of any  I don’t know chango - by based on the number of outlets they appear to have just crossed/or are about to cross that line 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...