Jump to content

Recommended Posts

...that's the price of them in the Fresh Flower Company on Northcross Road, and they are STUNNINGLY beautiful, so I've contemplated buying one and despite being able to afford it, it's a ?65 wreath I'll chuck away in a couple weeks!!! But they're soooooo pretty. Can anyone else out there make me feel better about buying one? Tell me it's perfectly normal....

bawdy-nan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always make one out of bits of the christmase

> tree, ivy, holly, rosemary, dried orange slices

> etc. I wouldn't say it's especially, er classy,

> but then, my christmas tree always looks like I've

> just emptied a bin bag over it ...


HAHAHHAAH bawdy-nan I love you. I'd buy your cheerfulness for ?60 hands down!

no, I wouldn't at all - and if I had the sort of money that meant it wouldn't notice - I would still feel ashamed as it's a complete waste of money and I would rather give it to someone more needy.


We have a toy snowman that we tie to the door knocker.

They were being sold somewhere on archdale road to support Peckham food bank (not sure what prices were) - if I was inclined to spend lots of money on a wreath I'd go there.


But to add - if you really like something and can afford it I don't see the problem with splurging every so often....

I make mine with stuff from the woods and my garden.


Bits always fall off it, but I just bung them back in again.


But having said that, if you can afford to spend ?65 on a wreath, you don't need the money for anything else and you really really love it, why not?


If you feel guilty, give another ?65 to a homeless charity or something.

I've thought about it again....


Yes - buy it - if it cheers you up and makes you happy, then that's a good thing.


Tie it onto your door with lots of wire and a padlock.


Maybe the owner of the shop has some tips on securing it so it doesn't get stolen.

Many people think nothing of spending that sort of money on a Christmas tree, which also only lasts a few weeks (unless it's pot grown and has roots) so I can't see the difference really.


And then you have to shell out more money on decorating the tree!


Go for it and enjoy it, I'd say. It will bring pleasure to passers by too if it is as beautiful as you say :)

The difference is that a Xmas tree is personal, inside the home, for family etc. This ring of flowers is just to show off to neighbours etc


Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Many people think nothing of spending that sort of

> money on a Christmas tree, which also only lasts a

> few weeks (unless it's pot grown and has roots) so

> I can't see the difference really.

>

> And then you have to shell out more money on

> decorating the tree!

I feel duty bound to post a photographic example of one of the beauties in question... and that's not even the best one! But alas, thanks for all the comments, I've decided to settle for a ?12 one from the Christmas Forest Dulwich, they plant a tree in Africa for every tree you buy (apparently) - seems a bit more sensible.


Happy Christmas neighbourly people.

If I was going to spend ?65 on a wreath from anywhere I'd get it from Fresh Flower Co - their stock is fantastic, and the arrangements are great. They're also very nice people. I've bought loads of flowers from there and I've always thought they were very good value.


Obviously I don't go there when I'm making a charitable donation, rather than buying flowers - that would be stupid. Like I don't go to the garage when I'm after a bacon sandwich. Fortunately, I can tell the difference.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
    • Amazing work from Leon, doing out electrical survey and replacing our consumer board. Great communications, tidy work, reliable friendly and reasonably priced. A pleasure to have around and highly recommended. 
    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...