Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

He seems to be hoping the coalition will self-destruct without him having to do anything. That does not look like happening, so he's now actually going to have to step up with policies and ideas, but unfortunately all Labours current policies are so close to the coalitions as to be the same. That means if he puts a good policy forward, the coalition can just nick it. Unless he puts some ideological distance between Labour and the coalition, this will be an ongoing problem.


And, unless he starts shaping the direction of the Labour party soon, then they won't be in a position to challenge at the next election. At the moment the polls look ok, but that is just coalition backlash which won't hold itself without some work on his part.


Unfortunately for Labour, there's not much else in the leaders cupboard.

This is why the length of time taken to elect a new leader was a huge mistake (and I'd say the mistake was made as soon as Brown's ego was put before the party - they knew how unpopular he was with the electorate and then buried their heads in the sand). It gave the coalition an unchallenged head start......so as you say...anything that Labour propose now has lost any benefit of the initiative to claim as their own. All that is left is to oppose.....but that's a minefield because all parties were campaigning that cuts had to be made. The Labour party needs to wake up ....and fast.

To be honest, Cameron wasn't just thought of as lightweight by Obama,the media held him as a Tim nice but dim with a silver spoon heir to Blair character for a long time, AAAAANNNND he managed to become prime minister without actually having any policies to speak of.

He even wanted to hug a hoodie.


Clearly Ed is thinking what's good for the goose......

If miliband was someone you liked you would blame the media for underrepresenting him


The next 12 months or so is not the time to score political points. No opposition leader of any hue is going to get any traction. Sure they could jump up and down and oppose this and that, and that may yet happen but it would be very productive.

He only has himself to blame for media under representation. If you go AWOL there's not a lot the media can report. I think Labour should be openly challenging the government on some of the balmy and unfair aspects of their proposed policies, at all times, because that's what forms debate. At the moment we have no opposition.
I think the country is still behind the government at the moment. To just oppose will just colour miliband in peoples mind. He also doesn't appear AWOL to me. I've followed him since election. I don't agree with everything he does but you say AWOl, i say playing a long game

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If miliband was someone you liked you would blame

> the media for underrepresenting him

>

> The next 12 months or so is not the time to score

> political points. No opposition leader of any hue

> is going to get any traction. Sure they could

> jump up and down and oppose this and that, and

> that may yet happen but it would be very

> productive.


do you mean unproductive, Sean?


I think Ed is finding his feet as leader of the Opposition. He has recently been on paternity leave and thats a private time for people.


As media is now reporting on a coaltion government - its not all about Cameron, there's the Libdems in the spotlight too, could be a factor in people's perceptions?


Cameron can get away without pandering to the traditional right of his party, eg on Europe, in order to 'appease' the coalition and argue the case for strong government.


Perhaps that factor brings less difference between policies of Government and the Oppostion to the fore.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think the country is still behind the government

> at the moment. To just oppose will just colour

> miliband in peoples mind. He also doesn't appear

> AWOL to me. I've followed him since election. I

> don't agree with everything he does but you say

> AWOl, i say playing a long game


Well, Labour supporters may have to play a very long game Sean, I suspect it will be a long time before they see power again if the the economy picks up and the tories ride the wave. The tories may not need the lib dems next time either. Any half decent party that is fortunate to see an economic recovery whilst in power should be able to win an election or two.


And Labour don't have a skilful operator like Tony Blair to turn to now and I'd suggest labour will live to rue the day they chose Ed over David. For me David looked like leadership material and the tories must be thinking how easy it is at the moment.


The Tories have more opposition from the lib dems within the coalition than they have from Ed Milliband. That's how it looks so far.

PS Tony's gone Mick. We don't need "skilful operators" of his sort in these straitened times.


David = connotations of the ghastly new labour that has sickened so many of their traditional supporters.

Ed = you have yet to see him prove himself in his new role but he will. Give him 100 days or whatever its supposed to take.


Anyway, I'd like to think in politics we are moving away from the focus on the leaders of either party.

I think the country is still behind the government at the moment.


You base that on what exactly? Can't think of a single opionion poll that shows any significant movement either way from the split elecotrate that returned a hung parliament.


You might be right on the long game thing (and on the opposition for opposition's sake point) though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good morning, neighbours! We have around 1,000+ glasses like these from a café that just closed down. Not sure if anyone would like to keep some before we send them to charity. Please feel free to come and pick them up at 22 Upland Road, SE22 9EF anytime before 31st Oct😉    
    • What "stricter" consequences could there be for shoplifting (or any other crime) than being put into jail, do you think? Though our prisons are of course full enough already, without more people being shoehorned  into them.
    • Returning to the original question, I had my jabs at Tessa Jowell yesterday. I was early and I was  seen on time, and it was a lovely pharmacist who did them, but the admin beforehand (not by her) was a bit iffy. I was given forms to fill in but not told what to do with them afterwards, so I  presumed I had to take them into the consulting room, as the rest was supposed to be filled in by a clinician, but no! After some time had elapsed and I had found a seat (there was no information on where to sit either, so people were sitting in two separate areas, neither of which had many seats) my name was called and  the forms were taken behind the counter. Be aware if you don't have an appointment - even in the relatively short time I was there, three people turned up without appointments having been sent there by a GP (I presume) or having  previously been  asked by the pharmacy to come  back at a different time, and they were all sent away again because the pharmacy didn't have enough flu vaccine until the following day. I have no idea if this was due to a misunderstanding on the people's side, their GP's or the pharmacy's, but none of them were very happy, and one lady said she "couldn't keep coming back" 😭  At least one of them didn't seem to understand what he was being told, possibly due to a language issue. I felt quite sorry for the pharmacist, who was giving jabs all day on top of her usual workload but still managing to stay cheerful! Though she wasn't the one dealing with the unhappy people! I have a sore arm from the Covid jab (I chose to have the jabs in different arms), but no other ill effects so far, touch wood. 
    • Line speed and the strength of your Wi-Fi signal are two separate things.  The first is determined by the type of connection (fibre/copper etc) to the outside world and the second is the connection between the device (printer/TV/laptop/tablet etc) and the router. If you are connecting a device to the router using cables (as Alec1 is) then this is will give the best possible connection but isn't practical for many without a degree of upheaval and even then not all devices (tablets for example) will allow a wired connection. So you relying on the quality of the Wi-Fi signal from the router to the device and this will depend on the quality of the router, the type of Wi-Fi connection (the frequency), line of sight etc - many different things.  This is why some people opt for a "mesh" type setup which is supposed to give a solid quality of Wi-Fi signal around the house with little or no blackspots.  It's expensive though and still requires the devices that send and receive the signal (like the plug-ins you have) to be wired to the router.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...