Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yeah probably a nice town house in Camberwell Grove and that's about it for Camberwell, or maybe they'll have a nice house in Dulwich Village but certainly not East Dulwich. Anyway these people earn enough money without their multi-million pound bonuses. I work hard for a living and although still just a small cog in a wheel I contribute in some small way to the success of the company. I expect a good wage but I certainly don't get an over-inflated performance related bonus whether my company has been successful or not. What these City types get in bonus money compared to the rest of us serfs is deplorable.

Jah - a lot of city traders actually get paid a fairly modest basic wage, almost all of their salary is in the form of a bonus. Personally I don't have a problem with people earning commission on money directly brought in for the company.


As for the wealth gap... times are changing, these banking jobs are now within the reach of most graduates if they have the inclination, intelligence and willpower. The opportunities are out there for almost anyone.

My friend did an audit of La Salles bank a couple of years back outside of chicago. There were a bunch of traders who were busy slapping each other on the back and popping open the champagne corks, bought with the fat bonuses they'd earned for all the profit they'd made the bank.


After looking at the very complicated financials and unravelling all the hideously complex instruments, hedges etc etc these guys had been working on all year, he worked out that the ultimately the bank would have had slightly more money if they'd just put the lot in a high street bank all year and sacked the lot of them.


They refused to believe it at first but he laid it all out for them to see and they couldn't deny the facts.

I'm not against banking at all, and worked in the city for many years. I worked with some excellent people and I worked with idiots who had perceptual hyperinflation regards their value and worth in this world.

"As for the wealth gap... times are changing, these banking jobs are now within the reach of most graduates if they have the inclination, intelligence and willpower. The opportunities are out there for almost anyone."


Jeremy, you are living in cloud-cuckoo land. Where do you think graduates come from? Council estates? Besides which, why should the rest of us have to live in a world where house prices are grossly inflated by their bonuses? Not everyone wants to be a city trader (I wouln't do it for all the money in the world).

with apologies to James for using the same quote from Jeremy:

"As for the wealth gap... times are changing, these banking jobs are now within the reach of most graduates if they have the inclination, intelligence and willpower. The opportunities are out there for almost anyone."


Again, this misses the point. Even (nay, even especially) if everyone DID want to become a city trader there are only so many available positions. So those that don't get the jobs have to look elsewehere and so on and on.


Anyone can do anything but not everyone can do everything - so how do we look after those that don't make the top positions. There was a time when a teacher or nurse was a relatively good job but if we just laugh at them and say "you have a degree you COULD earn a lot more money" it's not really going to help is it


Excellent post from Mockney which illustrates the fact that a little humilty would go a long way


And of course we are faced with the hilarious situation this week whre, having earned all of these billions, banks are now pleading to the outside sources for help. Bloody scroungers

James - I disagree, one of my best friends at University lived on a council estate in Liverpool. He was from a single parent family, they had absoutely nothing... but still managed to get a universtity education.


We all make choices, if you don't want to work in that sort of environment then fair enough. I can understand the appeal of working in creative/media industries. Similarly for nursing, teaching etc. But that's your choice, to complain that your don't get paid as much as those in other industries is absurd. You are the one in cloud-cuckoo land.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> James - I disagree, one of my best friends at

> University lived on a council estate in Liverpool.

> He was from a single parent family, they had

> absoutely nothing... but still managed to get a

> universtity education.


My Grandad smoked 60 Park Drive a day and lived to be 80.


I have a number of friends who work in (what might be called 'high-flying' jobs). I reckon around 80% of them went to Oxford or Cambridge. And 80% of those were educated privately.

Bob - yes, I accept that this is historically true. But where I work (one of the big banks), new traders are recruited into the industry through graduate programs. There are oxbridge graduates amongst them, but also plenty of other universities.


I hasten to add that I have a very lowly job within this company. But I can accept that there are others who are more talented than me, or who are very driven to succeed.

loathe tho I am to defend Norman Tebbit (to whom you refer I believe, James) he never did say that, What he said was


"I grew up in the 1930s with an unemployed father. He did not riot. He got on his bike and looked for work, and he went on looking until he found it"


which might suggest it but he didn't tell people to get on their bikes

It's not all one-in-the-eye for Jeremy. I accept that things are changing year by year. I'm sure his company are making an effort to recruit from a wider spectrum of candidates, just as Oxford and Cambridge are as well these days.


I think the 'very driven' will always succeed, regardless of background. But just below them are a whole load of other people for whom things could have been very different were it not for their personal circumstances. And I don't mean 'Daddy never gave them a seat on the board and a Ferrari'.. It's more basic than that. It can make such a difference to know, for example, that your family could help you out if you got behind a month or two with the rent - even if you never need ask for it.


It makes a huge psychological difference to how you go about life.

James, it's not about getting one up on each other. Sorry if I started to get too personal, btw. I'm just going from my own observations, that's all... and I know from experience that people from modest, even underpriveledged backgrounds can be very succesful in their chosen fields. You mention politics: I believe the same is true here to a certain extent, John Major being a famous example.


And yes, there are lots of women where I work... some in pretty senior positions, probably earning 7 figure salaries. It would be naive of me to suggest that it is just as easy for women to succeed as it is for men, but the situation is rapidly improving.

If we've never had it so good then why is social mobility worse than it was in the 50s? Why can you predict with 99% accuracy someone's prospects from their postcodes? Try telling the people on the breadline that "they've never had it so good"!


Btw Jeremy, apologies if I was a bit full-on. But the problem with these so-called "working-class" politicians is that there's always the suspicion they're laying it on a bit thick for the common touch. I doubt John Major's upbringing was hand-to-mouth. Please correct me if I'm wrong.


I think we all accept that some will always earn more than others. What is repugnant is the sheer scale of the discrepancy. I would rather go the way of the Scandinavians than the Yanks (remember New Orleans?)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...