Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was listening, to LBC this morning they mentioned a survey regarding siblings they said that majority of parents preferred boys to girls although they loved them equally this brought me to back when I was a child my parents definitely treated us differently than my brother especially in the Caribbean culture my brother was allowed to what he liked is that true in other households?

It would be so much easier to read if you put in the odd full stop, as it difficult to understand otherwise without reading it several times.


Anyway, I came from a family with 7 boys and one girl. She was known as Snow White. We were just Dwarves. I think we were all treated differently as we were all very different.

I think that on average there may be some truth with that- but may it is just one parent goes with one and one with the other. Quite a few families it is Father and daughter and mOther and son- or vica versa. I htink I heard the radio article and it was saying mums were much harder on their daughters than their sons and I think there is definitely some truth in that.

Being treated differently starts from the first day of suckling,


because boys are breast fed on average 1/3rd longer than their sisters.


This is because mum's allow boys to make greater demands on them than their daughters.


This one might think would make a difference to long-term survival, but it's not the case,


as girls are rather more durable and generally easier to raise than us ailing and sickly guys.


When the army lose some of their super-fit soldiers overnight on a foggy November evening they get helicopters with headlights to find them because the chances are some will die of exposure before daybreak.


When the army lose women over-night they leave them where they are, as they'll survive very well.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, good shout.  That is usually a better option, though it isn't always quicker. Last time I went there it was unusually busy and I had to wait a very long time. They did say this was unusual. But definitely usually quicker than Kings, even factoring in the additional travelling time. But easy to get there on the train, five minutes walk from London Bridge.
    • If you can get to Guy's Urgent Care Centre this is a better option for a suspected fracture. I went a couple of weeks ago after an ankle injury and the whole process of being seen, getting an x-ray etc took only two hours.
    • I know it's not the same thing, but if you went to A&E you would be able to get an immediate x-ray if they thought it was necessary. I know two people who weren't going to bother, and in both cases they had broken bones. Alternatively, try phoning the King's switchboard and asking? They might be able to put you through to someone who would know, even on a Saturday? Good luck!
    • I once did this years ago with a suspected fracture. Their web page says 'walk in service', although the first paragraph is about 'your letter'. An AI Google search answer says you need a letter from your GP to drop in. Any more recent experience greatly appreciated,  thank you.    Kings page about the clinic  https://www.kch.nhs.uk/services/services-a-to-z/general-imaging/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...