Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Last year was fantastic, with it being on a Saturday. Hundreds of kids out, grown ups really getting in the spirit of things with a lot of hard work having gone into amazing effects at some houses. I think I'll have to start talking it down for my two this year, it's bound to be a bit quieter. But it does allow for a halloween party on the saturday and Trick or treating on the Sunday, so double the fun!


(My excuse is having spent some of my childhood in the US, so I've always gone overboard for it. It's nice not to be just one of a few, these days.)

Keef,


My children are knocking on the doors of people we know - either fellow school families, or just friends due to having lived here for 15 years......but I really don't mind who knocks on my door as long as they have made the effort to dress up.


However, if you dislike it you shouldn't be harassed by it, I hope you will be able to have a quiet Halloween without any decorations up.

I don't really mind it too much, and it's fine if you're knocking on "friendly doors", but lots of kids knock everywhere, and I think that is a bit wrong, being that there could be elderly people home alone, or people with sleeping babies, who don't want the doorbell ringing (us last year).
Last couple of years when we've had little ones in bed, we've just put out the remaining goodies with a little note saying 'Kids in bed - please help yourself' or similar and we're never disturbed. And we've always had goodies left over too - which surprises me!

Very true Keef, when C was 3 weeks old 2 Halloweens ago we put a sign on the door explaining & saying "normal service back next year" it was really sweet as we heard lots of children approaching the door (we are known as Halloween friendly), then reading the sign & creeping away saying shhhh to their friends - not 1 trick or nasty reaction/door knock.


Pebbles - we dressed up but enjoyed staying at home answering the door with O for the first few years. I think she first went out with the neighbours children when she was 4. Not sure what we will do this year as I'm sure C at 2 will want to go out with the 'big girls' in her pumpkin costume!


P.s. O was a bit scared the year she was 2, so be a bit careful how you react to people at the door.

Isn't the accepted form to put pumpkin lanterns or decorations out if you're up for being trick-or-treated on? No decorations, no knocks on the door Keef - that's how it works round here, that way old ladies & grumpies don't get bothered. It's certainly what I drum into my kids.

First time for us this year - one 10 month old Pumpkin and one 3.5 year old Dragon. Oh and I think I've been ordered to be a witch - unless 'Mummy you're a witch' is actually meant to mean something else.


We'll be going on Sunday at 5.30ish - only to houses with Pumpkins on display. I'm hoping the resulting sugar rush will then disperse by bedtime.


We'll be leaving Daddy Wizard at home with the 'treat bucket'. Do you think any kids will be nervous of a tall man (sorry Wizard) opening the door and offering sweets? Or am I over-analysing this and do all kids go out with parents anyway?

You're overanalysing! ;-) Most kids that we see come with their parents even if standing back on the pavement and the few older ones as molly mentions do come on their own, but we don't get too many of them, just the wee ones who seemed well and truly shocked to be given candy/sweets from strangers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...