Jump to content

Recommended Posts

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It just seems extraordinary to me, a mere ignorant

> uneducated Leaver, that you are all exercising

> your democratic rights to protest to try to

> overturn a democratic decision by the British

> electorate to rid ourselves of a hugely

> undemocratic Brussels Juggernaut. Ironic,eh?


You are aware that there was a democratic decision by the British electorate (by 67% in favour) to join Europe in 1975, and that leavers spent the next forty years trying to overturn that result? Or does the right to continue campaigning only apply to one side?

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but you miss my point totally. Brussels is

> hugely undemocratic, expensive and massively

> corrupt. The euro is just a German racket. The

> whole rotten edifice is tottering.


I'm afraid I don't have much faith in the UK establishment either.


http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/when-a-mafia-expert-tells-us-britain-is-the-most-corrupt-country-in-the-world-its-time-to-start-a7057686.html


We just do it in a British way :)

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but you miss my point totally. Brussels is

> hugely undemocratic, expensive and massively

> corrupt. The euro is just a German racket. The

> whole rotten edifice is tottering.



No I haven't missed your point, subtle, well nuanced and backed by facts and argument as it isn't. You said you thought it was extraordinary that people were trying to "overturn a democratic decision by the British electorate." I simply pointed out that that is what the leave campaign have done for the last forty years.

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but you miss my point totally. Brussels is

> hugely undemocratic, expensive and massively

> corrupt. The euro is just a German racket. The

> whole rotten edifice is tottering.


... so wouldn't it be deliciously ironic if the undemocratic, expensive, but oh-so-British House of Lords holds up or even stops the whole Brexit process. Hopefully by democratically pushing it back to the people for ratification once we see the deal on offer.

The unelected House of Lords is a silly old anachronism that has little real power. Whilst it could still play silly games with Brexit ultimately it has to answer to the Commons which has a number of sanctions, even the ultimate one. My main gripe about Brussels, apart from open door mass migration, the crazed euro project, "ever close integration" and the enormous cost to the UK taxpayer, is that decisions are made by an unelected arrogant elite which cannot be held to account by anyone. As to wholesale corruption, The Big Boss Juncker presided for more than 20 years over Luxembourg, whose sole industry is tax avoidance, and denies even knowing anything about it. Say no more.

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The unelected House of Lords is a silly old

> anachronism that has little real power. Whilst it

> could still play silly games with Brexit

> ultimately it has to answer to the Commons which

> has a number of sanctions, even the ultimate one.

> My main gripe about Brussels, apart from open door

> mass migration, the crazed euro project, "ever

> close integration" and the enormous cost to the UK

> taxpayer, is that decisions are made by an

> unelected arrogant elite which cannot be held to

> account by anyone. As to wholesale corruption, The

> Big Boss Juncker presided for more than 20 years

> over Luxembourg, whose sole industry is tax

> avoidance, and denies even knowing anything about

> it. Say no more.


But 'unelected arrogant elite' is exactly what the so

called 'liberal elite' in London have been called - and

they are set to gain more power.


In fact we are set to become just like Luxembourg was.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/netherlands-brexit-tax-avoidance-trade-deal-lodewijk-asscher-theresa-may-conservatives-a7527656.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
    • Unless you're 5 years old or have been living in a cave for several decades you can't be for real. I don't believe that you're genuinely confused by this, no one who has access to newspapers, the tv news, the internet would ask this. Either you're an infant, or have recently woken up from a coma after decades, or you're a supercilious tw*t
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...