Jump to content

48% in East Dulwich (EU-referendum group)


Frank

Recommended Posts

Hi Pebs, yes I will do so :) I will post two links here later tonight. The link to our Facebook group is

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1092904207464344/

which is a closed group but I monitor every day whether new members request to sign up; This group also has a public page, here

https://www.facebook.com/48CamberwellPeckhamEastDulwich/

which people can read and interact with group members without joining the group :)

Cheers,

Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi TheCat,

> Of course life inside the EU also comes with a

> whole set of challenges. But I don't know any

> Remainer who is a afraid of a challenge. But

> Russian Roulette is not a challenge ... it is

> plain stupid. Theresa May's speech makes very

> clear where her priorities are ... and close

> international collaboration with your neighbours

> is not among them. Rather she spoke of making

> Britain Great again ... That is not a challenge,

> that is merely short-sighted.


Well, Theresa May is off to speak to the citizens of nowhere.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Economic_Forum


Or maybe only poor people cannot be citizens of the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking for hosts:

There will be a rally against Brexit in London on 25/3/2017 at 11h am at Westminster. Some members of the nation-wide 48% movement seek to travel from far away places to come to London but worry about the cost of accomodation on top of the rail/plane fares. As a local 48% group we are trying to see whether there are local people in our area who would be willing to host a participant to the rally on Fri/Sat 24/25 March and/or Sat/Sun 25/26 March?


Local London 48% groups are making an inventory and if we can generate a reasonable number of potential places then we will create a separate page where those who want to host and those who seek a host can find eachother.


If you are interested in hosting, please leave a response or send em a message (no need to join our group for this, but welcome of course), and indicate a preference for dates, number of guests. Note that this absolutely does NOT commit you to anything and at every point in the process it will be YOU who decides what they offer and to whom!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Pebs,


Sure, there will not be much that can stop that at such short notice. But this is a long game ... and the Art.50 trigger is only the beginning and not the end. It will take time for people to come to terms with the full impact of what a Brexit will be, it will also take time for people to accept that voting differently at the next election might not make any difference and that we need to solve this problem in a different way.


Maybe a year, maybe two? Who knows maybe even half a decade. But possibly also less than that. Every year that we can take off the most pessimist estimate is a year won for our youths, our kids, and those yet unborn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are some credible scenarios in which we will not Brexit.


A great deal will depend on the willingness of the Lib Dems to make a manifesto pledge that they will vote against it. I hope and believe they will: May (delayed by the Supreme Court) will be unable to call her vote on the final settlement before the next General Election. She will not be in power after that: the new coalition government will consist of moderate labour, centre-right Tories and Lib Dems. Nick Clegg has the experience to become PM in national unity. The EU will be understanding (thank goodness for the European Courts - they will rule that the calling of Article 50 by the previous government is revocable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jaywalker,

I agree that there are realistic scenarios in which an Art.50 trigger can be reversed. I think that a strong showing of movements like the 48% in the politics of the next 2 years can have a significant impact on the willingness of the EU27 and the European parliament to pave the way for a return of the UK into full EU membership. I don't believe it is merely a legal matter that the European Courts will take care of.

The European Courts might open the door in principle, but the re-entry fee will be determined politically not legally.

Frank

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's possible (albiet rather unlikely) that there could be a change of mood in the country on Brexit. After all, it was a very narrow victory for Leave, so it wouldn't take a huge shift in sentiment for the 'brexiters' to find themselves in the minority. In time, as inflation increases and people find the cost of living going up faster than earnings, it's easy to see a scenario where recriminations lead to calls for a rethink.

Like I say, i think it's probably unlikely, but not impossible. If there is one thing that 2016 taught us, it's that the seemingly far fetched can happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frank Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi TheCat,

> Of course life inside the EU also comes with a

> whole set of challenges. But I don't know any

> Remainer who is a afraid of a challenge. But

> Russian Roulette is not a challenge ... it is

> plain stupid. Theresa May's speech makes very

> clear where her priorities are ... and close

> international collaboration with your neighbours

> is not among them. Rather she spoke of making

> Britain Great again ... That is not a challenge,

> that is merely short-sighted.


I respectfully disagree with the point about international collaboration. Many Remainers seem to think that leaving the EU means we're shutting ourself off from the world...well The United Kingdom is a member of the G7, G20, NATO, all the UN bodies (not to mention having a permanent seat at the celebrated 'top table'), the Council of Europe, the OSCE, and the OECD, without starting on the Asian Development Bank (of which we're a nonregional member), the AfDB (nonregional member), the Arctic Council (observer), the Australia Group, the BIS, C, CBSS (observer), CD, CDB, CE, CERN, EAPC, EBRD, ECB, EIB, EITI (implementing country), ESA, FAO, FATF, the IADB, IAEA, the IBRD and the ICAO, the ICC (national committees), the ICCt, ICRM, IDA, IEA, IFAD, IFC, and the IFRCS, the IGAD (partners), the IHO, ILO, IMF, IMO, IMSO, Interpol, IOC, IOM, IPU, ISO, ITSO, ITU, ITUC (NGOs), MIGA, MINUSMA, MONUSCO, NEA, NSG, OAS (observer), OPCW, Pacific Alliance (observer), Paris Club, PCA, PIF (partner), SELEC (observer), SICA (observer), the WIPO, WMO, WTO, and the Zanger Committee....doesnt sound like a lack of international collaboration to me.....


Why does everything hinge on our membership of a limping political project on the western end of the Eurasian landmass?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think simply being a member of a lot of international institutions constitutes effective and economically beneficial global engagement TheCat. The point about the UK's EU membership (as far as global investors are concerned)is that it gives the UK unfettered access to a market which they want to reach as well. Investing in the UK has - until now - given them a gateway to that market. As Karan Bilimoria (founder of Cobra Beer) pointed out when he accompanied TM on that recent gig to India. He'd been part of similar delegations in the past when Indian investors had been all over them...not any more. Germany and Japan are now the favoured investment options.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think simply being a member of a lot of

> international institutions constitutes effective

> and economically beneficial global engagement

> TheCat. The point about the UK's EU membership (as

> far as global investors are concerned)is that it

> gives the UK unfettered access to a market which

> they want to reach as well. Investing in the UK

> has - until now - given them a gateway to that

> market. As Karan Bilimoria (founder of Cobra Beer)

> pointed out when he accompanied TM on that recent

> gig to India. He'd been part of similar

> delegations in the past when Indian investors had

> been all over them...not any more. Germany and

> Japan are now the favoured investment options.


the point made was about international collaboration. Not global investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I applaud what you're trying to do, but 50k members on FB is not a large number I'm afraid.


Brexit is happening, and it's happening at a time when we don't have a single senior politician on either side that I'm confident could negotiate with a street trader, let alone the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't believe all this. "LEAVE" is a simple word

> of only one syllable which surely even the dimmest

> amongst us must comprehend. Which part of it do

> you not understand?


"DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO PROTEST" is eight syllables but it's still quite simple to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It just seems extraordinary to me, a mere ignorant uneducated Leaver, that you are all exercising your democratic rights to protest to try to overturn a democratic decision by the British electorate to rid ourselves of a hugely undemocratic Brussels Juggernaut. Ironic,eh?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It just seems extraordinary to me, a mere ignorant

> uneducated Leaver, that you are all exercising

> your democratic rights to protest to try to

> overturn a democratic decision by the British

> electorate to rid ourselves of a hugely

> undemocratic Brussels Juggernaut. Ironic,eh?


As Trump would say, a movement takes years to accomplish.


Why should remain give up forever and if they aren't, why

should they give up now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ok here goes.....   Since day 1 of the LTNs the emergency services have been very clear - blocked roads increase response times. Southwark councillors were more than aware of this from the beginning of the LTN debacle during Covid because, when the council were going LTN mad and were trying to carpet bomb them everywhere they had suggested one for Peckham Rye and had initiated a consultation. As usual they took glowing endorsements of their proposal to close parts of Peckham Rye from the cycle lobby but got negative feedback from TFL and the emergency services due to the disruption their physical closure barriers were going to have - the emergency services made their preference clear that they do not like physical barriers. Needless to say Southwark ignored that emergency service input and pushed ahead with their plans only to cancel them when the realised LTNs were turning residents against them.   Now the video below (from March 2021) is interesting from a couple of perspectives: 1) Clearly LAS were making their feelings on permanent closures very clear to Southwark - please scroll to 1 hour 4 minutes to hear from them - 51 of the 170 delays caused by LTNs in London were in Southwark - yet it took over a year for emergency vehicles to be given access and, if I remember correctly FOIs showed that LAS had been writing to Dale Foden and the council alerting them to the delays. So why the delay and why is there a constant narrative from local lobby groups that the junction has to be closed to ALL traffic (including emergency vehicles) and why the new designs return to a partial full closure of the junction - most rational and pragmatic people can surely see that the compromise installed in 2022 to allow emergency vehicle access was the most sensible approach.   The council put the desires of local lobby groups ahead of the emergency services...which is madness...and then that leads us to point 2)....   2) Notice the presence of Jeremy Leach on the call - not a councillor but the Co-Optee of the council's environmental scrutiny committee and he is constantly pushing the councillors to do more to deal with traffic issues and reduce traffic. I suspect he is deemed one of the "expert" voices the council was turning to for guidance at this period. But, much like the activist researchers the council turned to Jeremy is very much an "activist expert" and was chair of the London Living Streets, co-founder of Action Vision Zero and part of Southwark Cyclists - so you can see why if the council was taking guidance and direction from him how they may have not been making decisions in the public interest. Clearly someone has convinced the council that the junction needs to be closed to all vehicles as there cannot be any other explanation for why they held out for so long (that created increased response times) - remember they are wasting another £1.5m to close one arm of the roads permanently again - honestly if someone wants to enlighten me to a part of this story I am missing then feel free but to me it looks like something very odd has been going on at the DV junction and the council is ignoring the majority and listening to the few...   https://lrscconference.org.uk/index.php/agenda-speakers/jeremy-leach-co-founder-action-vision-zero/     No it was 64% of the total who lived in the consultation area - 57% when the council looked at all the respondents to the consultation.   3,162 (64%) wanted it returned to its original state 823 (17%) wanted it retained as was 422 (8%) wanted a different measure installed 564 (11%) wanted the measure, but modify/ enhance it with other features   So back then the 11% got their wish!   In every consultation in relation to the DV junction there has been overwhelming rejection of the council's plans by local residents - yet they carry-on wasting our money on it regardless - just who are they trying to placate?
    • Calton was particularly hideous. An ambulance wouldn’t have got anywhere fast.   
    • Not clear what point you are trying to make here Earl? A majority of those consulted wanted measures returned to their original state. Majority is the salient point. Again, if consultations are pretty irrelevent, as you seem to suggest, then why do oragnisations like Southwark Cyclists repeatedly prompt their members, whether local to the consultation area or not, to respond to consultations on CPZ or LTNs. What a waste of everyone's time if of no import in terms of local policy-making.
    • Funny how some people don’t remember how awful it used to be  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...