Jump to content

Recommended Posts

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It just seems extraordinary to me, a mere ignorant

> uneducated Leaver, that you are all exercising

> your democratic rights to protest to try to

> overturn a democratic decision by the British

> electorate to rid ourselves of a hugely

> undemocratic Brussels Juggernaut. Ironic,eh?


You are aware that there was a democratic decision by the British electorate (by 67% in favour) to join Europe in 1975, and that leavers spent the next forty years trying to overturn that result? Or does the right to continue campaigning only apply to one side?

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but you miss my point totally. Brussels is

> hugely undemocratic, expensive and massively

> corrupt. The euro is just a German racket. The

> whole rotten edifice is tottering.


I'm afraid I don't have much faith in the UK establishment either.


http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/when-a-mafia-expert-tells-us-britain-is-the-most-corrupt-country-in-the-world-its-time-to-start-a7057686.html


We just do it in a British way :)

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but you miss my point totally. Brussels is

> hugely undemocratic, expensive and massively

> corrupt. The euro is just a German racket. The

> whole rotten edifice is tottering.



No I haven't missed your point, subtle, well nuanced and backed by facts and argument as it isn't. You said you thought it was extraordinary that people were trying to "overturn a democratic decision by the British electorate." I simply pointed out that that is what the leave campaign have done for the last forty years.

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but you miss my point totally. Brussels is

> hugely undemocratic, expensive and massively

> corrupt. The euro is just a German racket. The

> whole rotten edifice is tottering.


... so wouldn't it be deliciously ironic if the undemocratic, expensive, but oh-so-British House of Lords holds up or even stops the whole Brexit process. Hopefully by democratically pushing it back to the people for ratification once we see the deal on offer.

The unelected House of Lords is a silly old anachronism that has little real power. Whilst it could still play silly games with Brexit ultimately it has to answer to the Commons which has a number of sanctions, even the ultimate one. My main gripe about Brussels, apart from open door mass migration, the crazed euro project, "ever close integration" and the enormous cost to the UK taxpayer, is that decisions are made by an unelected arrogant elite which cannot be held to account by anyone. As to wholesale corruption, The Big Boss Juncker presided for more than 20 years over Luxembourg, whose sole industry is tax avoidance, and denies even knowing anything about it. Say no more.

apbremer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The unelected House of Lords is a silly old

> anachronism that has little real power. Whilst it

> could still play silly games with Brexit

> ultimately it has to answer to the Commons which

> has a number of sanctions, even the ultimate one.

> My main gripe about Brussels, apart from open door

> mass migration, the crazed euro project, "ever

> close integration" and the enormous cost to the UK

> taxpayer, is that decisions are made by an

> unelected arrogant elite which cannot be held to

> account by anyone. As to wholesale corruption, The

> Big Boss Juncker presided for more than 20 years

> over Luxembourg, whose sole industry is tax

> avoidance, and denies even knowing anything about

> it. Say no more.


But 'unelected arrogant elite' is exactly what the so

called 'liberal elite' in London have been called - and

they are set to gain more power.


In fact we are set to become just like Luxembourg was.


http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/netherlands-brexit-tax-avoidance-trade-deal-lodewijk-asscher-theresa-may-conservatives-a7527656.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Is Gigi spayed & microchipped?
    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...