Jump to content

What kind of lens should i get


JamesG

Recommended Posts

I agree in principle, but I think JamesG is in the 'exploration' zone, and it'll be useful to find out more about, and experiment with, some other subjects or styles.


It's called 'having fun' - rarely available to people who take things too seriously! ;-)


I reckon JamesG will have a great deal of fun with a 50mm prime, just as I did, and Mockney did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JamesG

So far you've said "no close-ups and no wildlife" and ?600 is too much. To be able to recommend much else we still need to know what photo subjects you're interested in and your budget.


If you like sport then you may well want a longer zoom option to reach the action from court/pitch side. You might also need a tele-extender.

If you are just happy snapping social subjects then a short zoom or prime would be best

If ?250 is still too much then you'll certainly be looking at second (or more) hand items and also consider looking at Sigma or Tamron to maximise value for some focal length choices.


If you want to try things out then hiring a few lens options and talking to pros will help assuming you can't borrow much.

Calumet are fine if a tad expensive at times. Somewhere more local to us is Fixation based in Vauxhall. www.fixationuk.com


Tell us more and we might be able to be more help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With my DSLR, I started off with the kit lens and then went on to buy a zoom lens.


I haven't used the zoom lens as much as I'd like, because of the generally bad light conditions in the UK. I learnt a general rule of thumb that seems to be true, in that your slowest shutter speed should be guided by your focal length i.e. if your lens is 100mm don't shoot slower than 1/100 second.


If you want to whack up the ISO or take a tripod it doesn't limit you, but otherwise in the UK I find it does - images are too dark or not sharp enough for my liking. Given that I'd tend to use the zoom to shoot wildlife I try to incorporate that on a walk rather than sit there all day with a tripod - whatever floats your boat really.


Last year I was very fortunate in that I was given a 50mm macro prime and I love it. The image is so sharp, and it keeps me happily entertained in the winter. Still life, icicles, etc. However, with hindsight I think a 100mm would have been even better.


I've bought 2nd hand kit from Amazon on various occasions and have no complaints at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I tried to engage one Dulwich by email.  They sent me a lot of flannel but were not prepared to discuss things.  I clearly will not be joining.  I support groups  that campaign to improve the environment, our health and well being etc not single issue groups who want to maintain the status quo.  
    • You have to spend time in the area, only you know what feels right for you. You will then probably have more specific questions to ask which will be easier to answer.
    • I've known of this forum for a while, and given its very active and obviously contains a lot of locals I thought this would be a good place to ask... I have a dilemma and I could find some old thread from '14, but obviously in a decade much has changed with all of these areas (maybe the village less so) - so some background I'll supply, and I'd love to know what folks think on the area that will suit best based on below situation and wants/needs Us Mid/late 30's have lived nearer to Clapham/Brixton for many years - current house large enough but small garden, and Brixton area not great for kids plus long school commute A young kid starting school in the not too distant future (school slap bang in the middle of all the Dulwich's (not state, so without naming it, you get the idea of location) Work remote mostly around St Pauls a few days (both parents) so half decent links to that area of London good  Requirements Access out of London to the SW/W required occasionally by car, don't know anyone further East/South really Want a larger garden for kid/us - ideally semi detached house at the least and nothing smaller than what we have (which rules out most of ED apart from Upland/Friern type houses) Things locally to do with kids (soft play/fun park/cinema etc) and also a few handy shops (Rosendale Road/Park Hall Road would likely cover most little things) Nice and relatively safe neighbourhood feel - currently most of our street are 20 something sharers who aren't able to work out how the wheeliebins work/Brixton nutters roam about here Not too loud, there is a lot of noise where we are now, and its not what I want next time - so away from main road/bus route ideally. Ideally a walk to school or very short car/bike/scooter ride weather permitting it is one of the well known Dulwich schools  My take on things - please correct me/add to this, as I am not a local! Budget is up to around £2m, and in ED to get the same size house (circa 1800 sqft 4/5 bed) I'd probably end up quite a way from things, either on Upland/Friern or the bottom of Peck Rye for example I've seen some houses, seems a bit remote - most of the houses with good access to Lordship are quite small. Houses in the Village are either too expensive or are going to be the same as what I have now albeit with a better garden, but decent neighbourhood feel/access to park/local shops and things etc I feel is peak here of all areas - its nice and quiet - transport is a bit pants mind you Houses in WD seem to be larger in size, have nice sized gardens, depending how close I can get to WD station, the school is very close, there are 3 stations that would work well, and there is a small selection of local shops, feels OK neighbourhood wise? Nearer Norwood end I worry of all the things I dislike about being near Brixton, but maybe that is unfounded.   On balance I think trying to buy something around Rosendale road shops in either direction a couple hundred meters is likely going to offer the best house, best transport options, and meet my criteria with quieter life and being best for the school. But it isn't close to any of the parks really, and is it a bit dull if I get sick of The Rosendale? Dulwich Village I suspect is the best all round option but transport isn't great and obviously its the most expensive, and the LTN on Court Lane makes living in the roads there (which is likely all I could afford) and trying to get out SW a pain as you have to go all the way around. I like Lordship lane the most as a place for 'stuff' (although not sure these days if its that child compatible with loads of young people?), but house wise I'd likely end up too far from anything interesting as anything within a short walk of LL is pretty small and they don't have decent sized gardens. Any opinions welcome and encouraged as short of spending bloody ages online I only know what I know from my handful of visits to either location over the years.
    • You might possibly consider that the the degree of scepticism and suspicion your original post encountered was largely due to the accusatory nature of the title in which you specifically identified a long-standing and respected local business. You also sensationalised the matter by using the words "poisoning" and  "twice!" in the heading.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...