Jump to content

Recommended Posts

no, I don't think that came up....it's all about america..



It's also interesting that this is all focused on Trump and not the actual half of the American citizens who voted for him... I would think that promotion of education in the local communities is as important - if not MORE important than complaining about Donald.

It was a welcome breath of fresh air and a really positive experience. Getting offline and meeting likeminded people was the highlight. Unfortunately we missed the speeches so I can't comment. Solidarity for the people of America was a driving factor for the march. But I agree a more specific agenda would have made it easier to understand.

Angelina Wrote:


> It's also interesting that this is all focused on

> Trump and not the actual half of the American

> citizens who voted for him...


It's worth noting that actually only 27% of those entitled to vote voted for Trump, so 73% of Americans didn't vote for him. As with Brexit, galvanising apathetic voters would seem to be the real problem...easier said than done.

Abe_froeman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did anyone point out to the women's march that in

> this country we are so progessive and egalitarian

> that our prime minister is actually a woman?


a distinction shared by Ceylon and India >50 years ago, and Israel, Pakistan and Bangladesh >40 years ago (of course mustn't forget us in 1979 for 11 years!) but unlike our current PM, all of these women were elected to the role by their putatively progressive and egalitarian countries

rendelharris Wrote:

>

> It's worth noting that actually only 27% of those

> entitled to vote voted for Trump, so 73% of

> Americans didn't vote for him. As with Brexit,

> galvanising apathetic voters would seem to be the

> real problem...easier said than done.


I think he won the election - the rules of which are clearly set out in advance.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------



>

> It's worth noting that actually only 27% of those

> entitled to vote voted for Trump, so 73% of

> Americans didn't vote for him. As with Brexit,

> galvanising apathetic voters would seem to be the

> real problem...easier said than done.


Likewise less than 1% of the female population marched on Sunday - are we to make any assumptions about the views of the other >99% being unsupportive?

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 27% of the electorate is quite a lot more people

> than put May in power or the Queen for that

> matter. I still think he is an idiot though.


I'm trying not to judge him before he makes his first big mess up.


He might be lucky ... or he could be remembered like


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_North,_Lord_North

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Angelina Wrote:

>

> > It's also interesting that this is all focused

> on

> > Trump and not the actual half of the American

> > citizens who voted for him...

>

> It's worth noting that actually only 27% of those

> entitled to vote voted for Trump, so 73% of

> Americans didn't vote for him. As with Brexit,

> galvanising apathetic voters would seem to be the

> real problem...easier said than done.


Turnout for the Brexit referendum was 71%, which was higher than the 66% turnout in the GE . GE turnout had been improving since its nadir in 1997 (sub 60%)

So, I'm not a fan at all of Piers Morgan, and have similar views of the Daily Mail.....but given Piers has stirred up so much 'controversy' over his comments on the Women's March, I thought I'd go and read what he said in his article on the weekend....


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4148206/PIERS-MORGAN-Madonna-Bomb-threats-don-t-Trump-hate.html


Personally I cant say I disagree with too much that he has actually written here.....

Piers:


It?s about striving to be so good at what you do that your gender is irrelevant, then making sure you are rewarded in the same way as a man. That, surely, is true equality?


As new British Prime Minister Theresa May said yesterday when she was asked what anti-sexism message she would have for President Trump when they meet on Friday: ?When I sit down, I think the biggest statement that will be made about the role of women is that I will be there as a female prime minister, talking directly to him about the interests we share.?


Halle-bloody-lujah!


THAT is a strong, empowered woman.


Theresa May didn?t need to march for her rights as a woman; she let her ability do the talking by marching up the ladder of her profession so capably that she?s now the most powerful person in Britain.


As a result, she has put herself in a position to make the very decisions that will protect and further women?s rights.



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4148206/PIERS-MORGAN-Madonna-Bomb-threats-don-t-Trump-hate.html#ixzz4WgeBdXYh

Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Angelina Wrote:

>

> > It's also interesting that this is all focused on

> > Trump and not the actual half of the American

> > citizens who voted for him...

>

> It's worth noting that actually only 27% of those

> entitled to vote voted for Trump, so 73% of

> Americans didn't vote for him. As with Brexit,

> galvanising apathetic voters would seem to be the

> real problem...easier said than done.


No, it's not worth noting that. At all.


God, I hate this ridiculous argument that keeps popping up in so many places that 'x% of people DIDN'T vote for whatever', by somehow taking into account the unknown views of people that couldn't be bothered enough to get off their backsides to exercise their right to vote. Don't care if it's Trump, Brexit or what video to borrow from the store (OK, showing my age there): not voting is accepting and validating the result, whatever it is.

So TheCat and Mick Mac. What do you think about Mike Pence's record on women's health issues? And how would you (if you were American) feel about the incoming administration as a result of that record? Might you be moved to demonstrate to make your views felt? (no matter if you were male or female)


Also specifically TheCat. Having heard the whole of Madonna's speech (as I'm sure you have) .....do you still feel Piers Morgan's interpretation to be accurate?

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> God, I hate this ridiculous argument that keeps

> popping up in so many places that 'x% of people

> DIDN'T vote for whatever', by somehow taking into

> account the unknown views of people that couldn't

> be bothered enough to get off their backsides to

> exercise their right to vote. Don't care if it's

> Trump, Brexit or what video to borrow from the

> store (OK, showing my age there): not voting is

> accepting and validating the result, whatever it

> is.


I remember a huge storm and stations in Central

London flooding. Many people gave up and went to

the pub.


Also 16-18 year olds should have been allowed to vote

- it's their future (not mine at 50)


edit: that was Brexit - and when I knew leave would win.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Angelina Wrote:

> >

> > > It's also interesting that this is all focused

> on

> > > Trump and not the actual half of the American

> > > citizens who voted for him...

> >

> > It's worth noting that actually only 27% of

> those

> > entitled to vote voted for Trump, so 73% of

> > Americans didn't vote for him. As with Brexit,

> > galvanising apathetic voters would seem to be

> the

> > real problem...easier said than done.

>

> No, it's not worth noting that. At all.

>

> God, I hate this ridiculous argument that keeps

> popping up in so many places that 'x% of people

> DIDN'T vote for whatever', by somehow taking into

> account the unknown views of people that couldn't

> be bothered enough to get off their backsides to

> exercise their right to vote. Don't care if it's

> Trump, Brexit or what video to borrow from the

> store (OK, showing my age there): not voting is

> accepting and validating the result, whatever it

> is.


That's not what I was arguing at all Loz. If people don't vote, tough, and their absence does not invalidate a ballot. The reason I mentioned this is that I was replying to Angelina's comment "It's also interesting that this is all focused on Trump and not the actual half of the American citizens who voted for him..." - simply making the point that we cannot assume that 50% of all Americans support Trump, we can only know that for sure about the 27% who voted for him, and in no way saying that invalidates his election.

Jenny1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So TheCat and Mick Mac. What do you think about

> Mike Pence's record on women's health issues? And

> how would you (if you were American) feel about

> the incoming administration as a result of that

> record? Might you be moved to demonstrate to make

> your views felt? (no matter if you were male or

> female)

>

> Also specifically TheCat. Having heard the whole

> of Madonna's speech (as I'm sure you have) .....do

> you still feel Piers Morgan's interpretation to be

> accurate?


I don't disagree that Trump and his administration have issues with their perceptions of women in the world, and there are issues which should be protested. I do have issues with some of the rehortic around these marches, where I feel the extremist feminist element has let those who truly believe in equality down. When I read banners like "the future is female", how am I meant to get on board with such a divisive slogan, and also look my son in the eye and tell him that according to these people (who claim to espouse equality) the future is not for him.


I haven't heard all of madonnas speech, as her shrieking is quite off-putting, but I have read a full transcript, and there's no getting around the fact that she said she has been thinking about blowing up the white house. Which for a public figure such as her to say is totally out of line in my view. Other than that, Jenny, where would you take issue with what piers Morgan has written?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...