Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Uncleglen is right. It is OK if the smoke is white

> (ie. burnt via an approved stove or coming from

> the burning of smokless fuel). On cold, still days

> even one house burning wood/coal etc. against the

> rules can really have a bad effect on those with

> breathing/lung problems, so if you are really

> enjoying the hygge glow you get but making "bad"

> smoke, just think of those whose health you are

> harming. That way, everyone wins: simple.



UG is right, yes he can smell wood smoke, but where does any post mention doing anything about breaking the law?


It doesn't, though you've convoluted the 'burning wood' thing to suit your finger wagging about 'bad' smoke


Why not start a 'bad smoke' thread, and flak off all you like on there about it.


I'd assume people burn within the remit of the law, else we're all under suspicion for something or other.

I hear Nigel Havers has been tapping on windows (PM, Radio4 just now) asking drivers to switch off. Got a few choice words in return and also some positive reactions too.


Personally, I like The Elusive Shadow's potato up the stack idea.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > The Law does not apply to those that impose

> it..

> >

> > >

> >

> >

> > Sorry to disagree with you again, Foxy, but I

> > think you will find it does unless there are

> > specific exemptions within it .....

>

> There are Always 'specific exemptions ' The people

> that write laws include backdoors to exempt those

> who understand the law.

>

> Foxy



This indeed foxy. Right again.


Louisa.

Sue, I'm sure even in the presence of facts "alternative examples" can be found to back up the claim.


Let's be honest, when laws are made or when a judge is considering passing a sentence the overriding thought in the back of their minds will be "don't forget to make a loophole for my mate"...


That must be clear to see...

Also, to add to the danger of particulates is the use of power tools on bricks, roofing slates, concrete etc which is rife in London at the moment. I saw a roofer using a power tool today and the dust coming off it was phenomenal......

sheff Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I'm sure even in the presence of facts

> "alternative examples" can be found to back up the

> claim.

>

> Let's be honest, when laws are made or when a

> judge is considering passing a sentence the

> overriding thought in the back of their minds will

> be "don't forget to make a loophole for my

> mate"...

>

> That must be clear to see...



:)) :)) :))

I asked - very politely and smilingly - a man to consider turning off his idling van engine as he sat and smoked a cigar in the driving seat. He told me to ask the same of all the people who were driving and wound his window back up. You win some, you lose some (probably many, if I continued around here!)

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Could we get this back on topic please, quite a

> > serious issue at hand here.

> >

>

>

> I take it you don't have any examples, then :))



Sue there are plenty of examples out there, if you need me or foxy to advise you of them then you have clearly lost the argument here! Goodness me, why do all threads need to rear off topic?


Louisa.

At risk of veering out of the ED topic zone, there's an event at Somerset House this weekend called Space to Breathe which looks interesting for finding out about combating city pollution: https://www.somersethouse.org.uk/whats-on/space-breathe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...