Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Uncleglen is right. It is OK if the smoke is white

> (ie. burnt via an approved stove or coming from

> the burning of smokless fuel). On cold, still days

> even one house burning wood/coal etc. against the

> rules can really have a bad effect on those with

> breathing/lung problems, so if you are really

> enjoying the hygge glow you get but making "bad"

> smoke, just think of those whose health you are

> harming. That way, everyone wins: simple.



UG is right, yes he can smell wood smoke, but where does any post mention doing anything about breaking the law?


It doesn't, though you've convoluted the 'burning wood' thing to suit your finger wagging about 'bad' smoke


Why not start a 'bad smoke' thread, and flak off all you like on there about it.


I'd assume people burn within the remit of the law, else we're all under suspicion for something or other.

I hear Nigel Havers has been tapping on windows (PM, Radio4 just now) asking drivers to switch off. Got a few choice words in return and also some positive reactions too.


Personally, I like The Elusive Shadow's potato up the stack idea.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DulwichFox Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > The Law does not apply to those that impose

> it..

> >

> > >

> >

> >

> > Sorry to disagree with you again, Foxy, but I

> > think you will find it does unless there are

> > specific exemptions within it .....

>

> There are Always 'specific exemptions ' The people

> that write laws include backdoors to exempt those

> who understand the law.

>

> Foxy



This indeed foxy. Right again.


Louisa.

Sue, I'm sure even in the presence of facts "alternative examples" can be found to back up the claim.


Let's be honest, when laws are made or when a judge is considering passing a sentence the overriding thought in the back of their minds will be "don't forget to make a loophole for my mate"...


That must be clear to see...

Also, to add to the danger of particulates is the use of power tools on bricks, roofing slates, concrete etc which is rife in London at the moment. I saw a roofer using a power tool today and the dust coming off it was phenomenal......

sheff Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I'm sure even in the presence of facts

> "alternative examples" can be found to back up the

> claim.

>

> Let's be honest, when laws are made or when a

> judge is considering passing a sentence the

> overriding thought in the back of their minds will

> be "don't forget to make a loophole for my

> mate"...

>

> That must be clear to see...



:)) :)) :))

I asked - very politely and smilingly - a man to consider turning off his idling van engine as he sat and smoked a cigar in the driving seat. He told me to ask the same of all the people who were driving and wound his window back up. You win some, you lose some (probably many, if I continued around here!)

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Louisa Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Could we get this back on topic please, quite a

> > serious issue at hand here.

> >

>

>

> I take it you don't have any examples, then :))



Sue there are plenty of examples out there, if you need me or foxy to advise you of them then you have clearly lost the argument here! Goodness me, why do all threads need to rear off topic?


Louisa.

At risk of veering out of the ED topic zone, there's an event at Somerset House this weekend called Space to Breathe which looks interesting for finding out about combating city pollution: https://www.somersethouse.org.uk/whats-on/space-breathe

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm finding this rather bizarre, rather than be cautiously optimistic some of you look at this to have an opportunity to have a go at Starmer and Trump.  The former has to adopt an approach this involves flattery to get any influence over the most powerful person in the world.  Sure he could and should have gone harder in terms of Gaza and opposing the genocide, and there are some questions over some arms sales.  I expect now we have vicars as terrorists the PA decision will prove wrong.  There are those in his own party who will continue to press him on this.  48 percent of the country say they would vote for a right wing party if their was an election today. Farage reportedly has denied that there is a genocide ongoing in Gaza and said he would not block any weapons exports to Israel if Reform UK came to power.  Badenoch's own words (on X) Recognising a Palestinian state won't bring the hostages home, won't end the war and won't get aid into Gaza. So it's reasonable to assume that around half the country would not support a stronger stance on criticising Israel's action. I don't have a lot of good things to say about Trump.  Yet if he can or has brought about a stable solution in Gaza then that will be great news.  That he didn't do this earlier, and in my view caused so many problems with the move of their embassy which in turn may have emboldened Hamas, remain valid issues, as do what the US is going to get out of it. As regards to earlier debate.  Israel protecting the UK from Iran just sounds bizarre.  The UK's position is that extensive diplomacy and a deal is the way forward. Yes there are so many other conflicts in the world that don't get the same level of attention.  But how many of these are directly due to a western democracy's extreme military action and starvation against a territory? I'm with the march in spirit but for apathy or whatever reason wont be there.  For those of you who consider it is antisemitic go and join the march and see.  I went to one of the large earlier demos and there was such a friendly and positive spirit despite the cause.  Yet the media pick on the occasional extreme incident, highly selective.  I'd prefer of they called it a peace protest rather than a pro-Palestine march.  I think it is right to look at the immediate desperate situation, and decouple from the longer term - albeit that the two station solution has to be the way forward and Israeli settlements are wrong.  Hopefully once there is a proper peace Netanyahu will go one way or another (I'm taking prosecution).
    • Starmer hasnt said that’s far as I can see? About Trump deserving the Nobel prize  I mean     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...