Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi, I've a question regarding feedback.

If for example if I've experienced bad services with a particular workman/company, which however have got 2 x positives feedback on here(but one of it is from himself), so what if my experiences is not a positive one, does this mean I wouldn't be allowed to leave a warning feedback?


answer on the postcard please.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/139976-feedback-question/
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

Hi DuckOfBorough


You were banned this morning as Penfold7 because posted numerous times in different sections abut a particular builder. You are free to post about your experiences however you didn't, you just said you don't rate them, no details about your experience. So, assuming they're an East Dulwich company please feel free, let rip, share the facts, post about your experience in the business section.

Yes, this is correct. Indeed, the message was rather polite with the name of the company/workman, 'I don't rate it' (This is a review itself no?) follow by 'email if you like more info'. This is actually a very polite, so I don't know what the problem is. So does this mean you have re posted the message? Also may I point out you've been happy to have this particular company/workman to false adversiting since mid 2016 (I didn't realise self advertising was allow on here now?) But my polite message was not exceptable. This is redicoulous. However re multi reposting, I did not know this was not allow. So am I allow to mention the name of this person and company?

Hello Ducky


You have read the Admins response above your posts? What part of that is unclear, maybe I can help you?



DuckOfBorough Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes, this is correct. Indeed, the message was

> rather polite with the name of the

> company/workman, 'I don't rate it' (This is a

> review itself no?) follow by 'email if you like

> more info'. This is actually a very polite, so I

> don't know what the problem is. So does this mean

> you have re posted the message? Also may I point

> out you've been happy to have this particular

> company/workman to false adversiting since mid

> 2016 (I didn't realise self advertising was allow

> on here now?) But my polite message was not

> exceptable. This is redicoulous. However re multi

> reposting, I did not know this was not allow. So

> am I allow to mention the name of this person and

> company?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Reeves says she's in charge and no no's Rayners plan, what happens now?
    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...