Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Certain words are NOT acceptable on the forum, cunt and fuck are prime examples


This has led to the creation of alternative 'Bad Words' and it's a joy to behold


'Twunt' is new to the list


C-nut


Fooker


All these add spice when used with a light hand. With that in mind, I'd like to compile a compendium of alternatives , to be used creatively in the rough and tumble of the Forum.


However, I'm not advocating the use (however creative) of nasty, sexist, racist words, or any other ists and isms for that matter.


Please feel free to add one or two of your own to the list.


Thank you

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/140068-permissible-edf-bad-words/
Share on other sites

Seeing as blow-in has been banned, I've found myself struggling to describe some members of our community based on their social class or food/shop preferences, with a single word or phrase. I often now say "Guardianista", or "look at me" to refer to this sub section of people lurking around ED.


Louisa.

I concede that one to you red devil it was indeed you who gifted me this new and exciting phrase. Despite the ban on blow-in, I managed to adapt "look at me" and so far it's worked relatively OK. Although I fear it's time over, and potentially could be added to the EDF bin of offence.


Louisa.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i don't bother with Libtard but as a true liberal

> I have always used 'liberal' for the deeply

> illiberal morally certain inflexibly minded :)


Hmm. As a true liberal I always get annoyed when people misuse the term to mean 'illiberal lefty'. I blame the Americans.


Anyway, 'twunt' isn't a new creation. It's been around for at least a couple of decades.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He looks like the human version of the 😡 emoji. I'm sure he's lovely in real life (whoever he is).
    • Absolutely, Insuflo I very much doubt that anyone other than football fans would have heard of Dyche, much less his views on false number nines, mobile centre halves  dropping into midfield or diamond formations. But all middle-aged, portly, bald, gruffly spoken football fans from north of the capital who eschew fancy Dan tactics for the traditional, English merits of 4-4-2 shall be deemed knuckle-dragging Neanderthals by the Wokerati and the Metropolitan Elite. They care not what his views are, only that he looks like the sort of person who may have them. It's political correctness gone mad. But they, unlike Dyche, won't have a pub named after them.
    • I'm afraid I have no idea who Sean Dyche is, but I'm sure I could research him (and his views on library refurbishment timetables, if any) on any of the Southwark libraries' internet access computers. Free for any library member!
    • So that suggests the consultations with 'community' are just a tick box exercise where information given cannot be relied on. Not a good look. I hope Renata Hamvas who is the local councillor, as well as licensing, finds a way to stop the wholesale, spreadingmonetisation of an important green space in summer. If they get this it'll end up like Brockwell Park before you know it.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...