Jump to content

Recommended Posts

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> where the UK is bending over backwards to

> accommodate Russian interests too. Which we are.



Go on then. Not sure what it has to do with Trump though?

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> > where the UK is bending over backwards to

> > accommodate Russian interests too. Which we

> are.

>

>

> Go on then. Not sure what it has to do with Trump

> though?


I give you Owen Jones :)


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/12/tory-links-russia-saudi-links-corbyn-spy-extremism


But it's nothing to do with Trump except the perhaps same Russian people trying to control Western interests.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> where the UK is bending over backwards to

> accommodate Russian interests too. Which we are.



That isn't the point, is it?


And to the best of my knowledge the site I linked to is not a "conspiracy site."

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

ExtremeEntertainment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you wont get much of an opinion oh here there

> mostly libraels or feminists. and we all know

> there trump haters.



If you?re going to be annoyed at people who disagree with you at least be original about it...yawn...


By the way, huge tranches of the American right-wing (hardly bastions of liberalism - awhaywver you think that is - or feminism) really hate Trump. But then that doesn?t chime with your world-view so you just dismiss anything you don?t like as lies.

ExtremeEntertainment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you wont get much of an opinion oh here there

> mostly libraels or feminists. and we all know

> there trump haters.


Nine grammatical and spelling errors in eighteen words, hats off to you!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Meanwhile most important news of the day ..

>

> "US President Donald Trump has faced ridicule

> online after he was filmed boarding Air Force One

> with what appears to be a length of toilet tissue

> attached to his shoe."



Well, appropriate, as he is a shit.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?



I thought of that one - but Jerusalem :)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?


Ah. Indeed. My old GCSE English teacher would be howling at me now.


(The A Level teachers wouldn?t have cared at all!)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?



It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current trend for many people being interviewed to start their answer to a question with the stabiliser ?so?.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JoeLeg Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I only count eight, but your point stands.

> >

> > Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> > conjunction?

>

>

> It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence

> with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what

> I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current

> trend for many people being interviewed to start

> their answer to a question with the stabiliser

> ?so?.


Correction, some people think it's acceptable to start a sentence with a conjunction. It has become accepted through frequent (mis)use - just as starting an answer with "so" will doubtless become, will you then regard it as acceptable once it has become normalised?

Would you buy a chlorinated chicken off this man ?


"Donald Trump has said he believes Russian leader Vladimir Putin is ?probably? behind a recent spate of poisonings and assassinations ? but appeared to suggest they were not relevant because they did not happen in the US."

keano77 Wrote:

-

> >

> > Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> > conjunction?

>

>

> It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence

> with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what

> I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current

> trend for many people being interviewed to start

> their answer to a question with the stabiliser

> ?so?.



Language changes, otherwise we'd all still be speaking and writing like Chaucer (assuming he spoke like he wrote :)) ) or in fact, going back to the mists of time, just sort of burbling :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...