Jump to content

Recommended Posts

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> where the UK is bending over backwards to

> accommodate Russian interests too. Which we are.



Go on then. Not sure what it has to do with Trump though?

JoeLeg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> malumbu Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> > where the UK is bending over backwards to

> > accommodate Russian interests too. Which we

> are.

>

>

> Go on then. Not sure what it has to do with Trump

> though?


I give you Owen Jones :)


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/12/tory-links-russia-saudi-links-corbyn-spy-extremism


But it's nothing to do with Trump except the perhaps same Russian people trying to control Western interests.

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue, I am sure that can find conspiracy sites

> where the UK is bending over backwards to

> accommodate Russian interests too. Which we are.



That isn't the point, is it?


And to the best of my knowledge the site I linked to is not a "conspiracy site."

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

ExtremeEntertainment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you wont get much of an opinion oh here there

> mostly libraels or feminists. and we all know

> there trump haters.



If you?re going to be annoyed at people who disagree with you at least be original about it...yawn...


By the way, huge tranches of the American right-wing (hardly bastions of liberalism - awhaywver you think that is - or feminism) really hate Trump. But then that doesn?t chime with your world-view so you just dismiss anything you don?t like as lies.

ExtremeEntertainment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> you wont get much of an opinion oh here there

> mostly libraels or feminists. and we all know

> there trump haters.


Nine grammatical and spelling errors in eighteen words, hats off to you!

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Meanwhile most important news of the day ..

>

> "US President Donald Trump has faced ridicule

> online after he was filmed boarding Air Force One

> with what appears to be a length of toilet tissue

> attached to his shoe."



Well, appropriate, as he is a shit.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?



I thought of that one - but Jerusalem :)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?


Ah. Indeed. My old GCSE English teacher would be howling at me now.


(The A Level teachers wouldn?t have cared at all!)

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JoeLeg Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I only count eight, but your point stands.

>

> Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> conjunction?



It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current trend for many people being interviewed to start their answer to a question with the stabiliser ?so?.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > JoeLeg Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I only count eight, but your point stands.

> >

> > Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> > conjunction?

>

>

> It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence

> with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what

> I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current

> trend for many people being interviewed to start

> their answer to a question with the stabiliser

> ?so?.


Correction, some people think it's acceptable to start a sentence with a conjunction. It has become accepted through frequent (mis)use - just as starting an answer with "so" will doubtless become, will you then regard it as acceptable once it has become normalised?

Would you buy a chlorinated chicken off this man ?


"Donald Trump has said he believes Russian leader Vladimir Putin is ?probably? behind a recent spate of poisonings and assassinations ? but appeared to suggest they were not relevant because they did not happen in the US."

keano77 Wrote:

-

> >

> > Did you count beginning a sentence with a

> > conjunction?

>

>

> It can be perfectly acceptable to start a sentence

> with the conjunction ?and? these days despite what

> I was taught at school. My bugbear is the current

> trend for many people being interviewed to start

> their answer to a question with the stabiliser

> ?so?.



Language changes, otherwise we'd all still be speaking and writing like Chaucer (assuming he spoke like he wrote :)) ) or in fact, going back to the mists of time, just sort of burbling :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
    • I had some time with him recently at the local neighbourhood forum and actually was pretty impressed by him, I think he's come a long way.
    • I cook at home - almost 95% of what we eat at home is cooked from scratch.  But eating out is more than just having dinner, it is socialising and doing something different. Also,sometimes it is nice to pay someone else to cook and clear up.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...