Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Saw Trump by chance as his cavalcade came up the M11. For once something to thank Michael O'Leary for (yet another late arrival Ryanair). He didn't wave, in fact unlike our monarch I couldn't even see into his car.


Lots of armoured vehicles and police outriders though.

Umhhh, I would judge that as quite well handled by Trump, probably one of his better interviews. Seamlessly moves from Brexit to his own election. And yes immigration was the main reason for Brexit. Generally poorly informed of course. Think there would be greater merit in showing clips of people in the UK sticking up for him (not Farage who also handles this well) but Reece Mogg......

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Theresa May delivered this line on Marr this

> morning to the question what course of action did

> Mr Trump recommend to you with respect to the EU.

>

> "Sue Them"


He probably stated it in words she could understand- because she sure as hell did not heed his more detailed advice earlier on....

Khans excuse for allowing the puerile baby trump to fly- 'it's not my role to be a censor'....what a hypocrite after he banned all bikini ads on the underground within weeks of taking office!

It's a pity all you naysayers do not read what Trump has achieved whilst in office......still you lot never did like the truth

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> It's a pity all you naysayers do not read what

> Trump has achieved whilst in office......still you

> lot never did like the truth


One achievement Uncle, just one thing that has made America or the world a better place. Just one.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----


> He probably stated it in words she could

> understand- because she sure as hell did not heed

> his more detailed advice earlier on....


And why should she?


> Khans excuse for allowing the puerile baby trump

> to fly- 'it's not my role to be a censor'....what

> a hypocrite after he banned all bikini ads on the

> underground within weeks of taking office!


You don?t like Khan as a person. Your entire view of him is tainted by that fact.


> It's a pity all you naysayers do not read what

> Trump has achieved whilst in office......still you

> lot never did like the truth


Job growth rates in the US are actually slowing now. The whole healthcare debate is sill raging and he?s embroiled in a tariff war with China. These are the actions of someone who is determined to shake things up and like a snow globe we are a long way from seeing where the dust will settle. The USA is a remarkably fractured society socially and racially, and he seems reluctant to drain the swamp as much as he promised too so this seems unlikely to change. By far the highest driver of equality is a *lack* of mistrust and bigotry, leading to a level playing field, something the USA manifestly lacks. America is far from being the land of milk and obey for all its citizens.


However, pretty much everything he has done is domestic US policy and as such very much their business and not ours. Internationally he?s been a much more divisive figure and has failed to actually deliver much. His summit with Putin will be an interesting test.


As far as the truth is concerned, you seem to only be on speaking terms with it when it conforms to your narrow little echo chamber, so I?m not sure I?m taking lectures from you there.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> JohnL Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Theresa May delivered this line on Marr this

> > morning to the question what course of action

> did

> > Mr Trump recommend to you with respect to the

> EU.

> >

> > "Sue Them"

>

> He probably stated it in words she could

> understand- because she sure as hell did not heed

> his more detailed advice earlier on....

> Khans excuse for allowing the puerile baby trump

> to fly- 'it's not my role to be a censor'....what

> a hypocrite after he banned all bikini ads on the

> underground within weeks of taking office!



Do you disagree with this and if so why?



https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/sadiq-khan-there-will-be-no-more-body-shaming-adverts-on-the-tube-a3269951.html

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > It's a pity all you naysayers do not read what

> > Trump has achieved whilst in office......still

> you

> > lot never did like the truth

>

> One achievement Uncle, just one thing that has

> made America or the world a better place. Just

> one.


The dangerous achievement IMHO is he has destabilised what is called recently "the rules based international system" meaning that something else can be readied to take over. This is what Change Managers do - break down the old system before establishing the new.


You suspect any new system won't be good looking at history.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> When will we find out what Putin has on Trump? An

> election win maybe?



Given what we know about Trump's character, I'm guessing it's more likely to be something personal which if it was publicised (ie any evidence for it) would make Trump look bad.


Like this:


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/donald-trump-pee-tape-golden-showers-prostitutes-moscow-james-comey-cnn-a8303056.html

In 1983 I went for an interview as a medical products rep. The chap posed a question - you've got the trots and take some of our product. It doesn't work.


A pharmacist you are trying to sell to asks you how good the product is. What do you say?


It's brilliant I say.


Integrity young person, integrity. I'd never used that word before but it has stuck with me for 35 years.


Trump. Integrity. WTF

To Iranian President Rouhani: NEVER, EVER THREATEN THE UNITED STATES AGAIN OR YOU WILL SUFFER CONSEQUENCES THE LIKES OF WHICH FEW THROUGHOUT HISTORY HAVE EVER SUFFERED BEFORE. WE ARE NO LONGER A COUNTRY THAT WILL STAND FOR YOUR DEMENTED WORDS OF VIOLENCE & DEATH. BE CAUTIOUS!



I love that most of the replies to this just seem to question if it violates Twitter's codes of posting.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Try oru space with Michelle. Think it runs on Wednesday evenings. She’s great. I also think the new casa core place does one but haven’t tried it. 
    • The OP is simply asking a question? and as a few people on this forum seem to know about every subject posted 🙄 maybe that was the reason for asking?😉 It's been such a dry summer so far, maybe "some trees" are becoming less stable due to lack of rainfall and needed some safety pollarding work?  (another question🙂)  
    • No offence, but why not start from the assumption that the trees team in Southwark Council know what they're doing because it's their job and aren't a bunch of ecogenocidal maniacs looking for excuses to cut back trees? I'm not an expert but if they're not coming back to cut down the rest, then it seems like pollarding. It always looks ugly at first. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding
    • It looks like the branches overhung the entry way to the toilets. There's a lot of paranoia about at the moment about branch drop after a couple of sad accidents which have happened recently where beloved trees were propped up but still dropped branches then everyone jumps up and asks why nothing was done before. You might remember when the massive oak fell over in Peckham Rye by the skating park, thankfully no one was hurt.  I've noticed notices in almost every public space warning about branch drop and some trees have had barriers put underneath them etc. These things seem to come into vogue and then pass again.  I expect local authorities in their regular meetings have all been discussing their risk exposure and issues of corporate responsibility etc....and someone will have been assigned the task (and responsibility) of making everything all right. Perhaps this tree fell victim to that. I doubt there is malice and something they feel is safer/appropriate etc will take its place in due course.  I don't doubt cutting it back is an over reaction but at the same time we all bellow at them when things go wrong so there is a difficult path to navigate. It was a chestnut by the look of it, so not particularly rare I have plenty of saplings growing through my beds if they wish to replace like for like.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...