Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Seems like a decent article to me. Remember it's probably written by someone who doesn't know the area as well as us, for people who don't know it at all and it seems to give a good overview.


And believe me, very few journalists have the opportunity to be lazy these days.

sedgewick Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hackblade Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I do and I know some Guardian journalists and

> they

> > work damn hard.

>

>

> HAHA!

>

> The voice of the Guarniad.


Sorry to be spellist Sedgewick but I think you'll find it's Grauniad.

puzzled Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> god, you people are appalling. so desperate to

> scribble down angst and spite. the paper was being

> nice about where we live for chrissake1 i live in

> east dulwich and I like it. and LL IS in se22. if

> you moaners don't like it here, clear off.none of

> us will miss you


Good idea.


this is a no sedition zone.

genwilliams Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It would be VERY nice to have a Boots or

> Superdrug. No more having to traipse over to Rye

> Lane or get a bus to Camberwell...


xxxxxxx


Yeh, let's just bring in all the high street chains, then we can live somewhere that looks just like everywhere else in the country :-S


Peckham and Camberwell are both within easy walking distance of Lordship Lane, FFS :))


And there's also a Boots in Forest Hill, should you happen to live at the other end of East Dulwich.


In fact we're surrounded by Boots branches :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...