Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I need some help, I am cooking a leg of lamb for Sunday roast. However my scales are broken and the weight on the label is illegible. I am cooking for four people and want to have it ready for 6pm, any idea how long a standard leg of lamb takes to roast? Any tips would be really appreciated. Many Thanks :)

half an hour per pound (hour per kilo) minus a bit if you prefer it pink at 200 C or an extra 5 minutes per pound at 180 if you like slower roasting.


Usual for four I guess would be around 4 pounds/2 kilosish, so aim for about an hour and 45 minutes - 2 hours at a guess, a bit longer if it's on the bone.


Skewer it to check juices if you're unsure, luckily lamb can be served really rather pink so no need to err on the side of caution and overcook, unless you like it that way of course.

You have to really frazzle lamb to overcook it as it's a moist meat, remember to spoon juices.

ooh, and rest the meat for at least 15-20 minutes before carving, it took me a while to learn the importance of the rest, but i cannot overstate the difference it makes. Plus now I'm older I'm less impatient :)

Mockney, you've obviously been watching far too much of the lovely Katie... I'm assuming that's where your roast lamb knowledge stems from? ;-) Although it's possible that lamb is far too common for that show, and the children have been preparing roast pheasant instead...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I think you can write to your local council to get the street cleaned more regularly. Also the may put more posters up to remind ppl to do clean up 
    • Absolutely right.  The other issue is that rescue centres like Celia Hammond make it nearly impossible to adopt a kitten or cat that desperately needs a home. I know many many people who have tried to adopt and have been refused, and only one couple who have been deemed to have a good enough home. The reasons people have been refused have been that they aren't in a position to take two kittens - unless it's changed recently you weren't considered unless you took 2 as cats  wouldn't be homed without a companion. But lots of people can't afford to feed and insure 2 pets. Another reason I've heard several times is that the potential adoptee lives on a road, not an A road or the south circular but just a road. But what is the other option they're looking for? A country estate? Another reason a couple of friends have been refused is that they have jobs and Celia Hammond said that they were looking for people who were at home all day . So again, what are they looking for? People who can afford not to work?  We are told 'adopt don't shop' but out of the many many families or individuals I know who have tried to give a loving home to a kitten / cat literally only a couple have been accepted, so have ended up buying a kitten. People who have had cats all their lives and adore cats. Of course it's important that adoptees are vetted but it's problematic that cat charities are deciding that a cat / kitten without a home would rather live in a cage at a rescue centre than with a loving person who has a job or lives on a road or cannot afford to pay for the upkeep of more than one pet. My friend has recently tried for months to adopt kittens or cats through various centres and although she was prepared to take two, was rejected by all rescue centres  as she lives on a (quiet) residential road in ED and doesn't work from home every day. She works from home 3 days a week. It's insane.   
    • Most owners do.  Beyond getting it off you chest, or shoe, you won't change a thing by posting here 
    • Kartuli is my favourite window - looking so beautiful! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...