Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Two mornings this week, men with litter picking up sticks have walked past the house as I've been digging out the car.


I dunno but is litter a priority right now? And how do they find it? Perhaps they have some crisp bag detection device.


Sometimes the council is just plain dumb, other times, its behaviour passeth all understanding.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/14630-stupid-stupid-stupid/
Share on other sites

Boris ...


?We have virtually cornered the world market in Egyptian salt and we are sitting on a kind of salt mountain.?


Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The council can only store a limited amount of

> grit. If they gritted all the side roads, they'd

> run out of grit pretty quickly. Then what happens

> if it snows again?

Rye Lane gets filthy in the snow/slush mind - just a bit of sweeping would help there.


steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Because I was saying something different. What

> kind of council foreman sends the chaps out on

> litter patrol in the snow? Almost anything else

> would be less futile.

Clearly sending anyone out litter picking in areas covered in snow and ice is as the subject line says - stupid, stupid, stupid - it's also contrary to Southwarks Winter Service Plan.


I've contacted officers to ask why this obsurd working is going on when we need street cleaners - as per the Winter Service Plan - to be used to help clear our streets of snow and ice.

James I ve rung the council this morning to no avail to ask them to grit our streets- although routes nearbye are accessable we cannot reach them through our inaccessible ice rink residential roads. I need to drive because my work entails coming home late at night as a performer and last night I had to cancel my gig even though it is only in North London and North London had no problems. As a pedestrian, crossing these roads is taking your life in your hands as it is so slippy.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The Sky article says the manager has apologised. Apparently, according to the article the person who said they'd apply on Rachel and her husband behalf left and didn't hand the job on. Here's the article https://news.sky.com/story/politics-latest-reeves-rent-mistake-labour-starmer-asylum-budget-tax-farage-reform-12593360?postid=10440668#liveblog-body
    • Or another thing journalists could do if they wanted to is unearth how many reform or Tory MPs are landlords with similar or worse errors   
    • I'm utterly baffled as to why anybody thinks this is newsworthy, let alone worth a front page. The economy has barely grown for 20 years and the housing crisis has been worsening for a similar time period. Note to any journalists on the forum: maybe focus your headlines on important issues.
    • Two wrongs might not make a right. But the two wrongs could at least be of equal value before we get too judgey    paying an estate agent to deal with all of the admin on my to have the estate agent not point out all of the admin  vs Deliberately hacking into an MPs email. And boasting about it (Badenoch)    as for throwing a local estate agent under the bus, when did local estate agents become the good guys?   doesn’t sound like estate agents are being thrown under a bus - they are fessing up. And Reeves doesn’t look to have done anything wrong  yet people will still believe the worst anyway    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/30/rachel-reeves-row-standards-adviser-looking-at-new-infomation?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...