Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello there, contrary to my screen name I am not really Italian but thought that was a nice screen name. My given name is a bit more Scot light but I am not in the least bit scottish.Anyway, I thought I would post here and get a date or something. Let's not have any scabrous wits making silly comments because if you were really that funny you would be on IQ or radio 4. I like films and cycling. I am just under 6", way under but let's leave something exciting for the great reveal. I used to read a lot but not so much. I do like TV and talking and travel a bit. Anyway , drop me a private message if you are interested. cheers

Quite frankly with such a well-constructed, insightful and slightly mysterious introductory technique, I fear you are about to be inundated with replies from eager and willing Females. Its surely only a matter of time.


Hope you can handle the inevitable deluge.

I am laughing, but I still haven't got a date. Oh well. I wonder should I spread the net a little wider? 25 - 45 years of age? Well, it does not have to be a date, that's so American; Brits dont really date, do we? I mean we pretend we date but we are far too sophisticated for dating. I find a bit of banter over two glasses of red and you pretty much know whether you'd like to spend more time with a person or not. Is that March 13th of 2011? That seems a rather long time to wait. Not that I am in any kind of hurry. I thought the retired Hipsters of ED would be down with meeting someone over the internet but apparently that's not the case. I just have to return to the pub and wait for someone to stumble on me as they rush to the bathroom to vomit.
I don't know about the smacking thing, it seems a bit forward for a first date wouldn't you say? I am going for the personality track. I think, if I wanted a bimbo that would fall for a line in brilliant patter I would be on match.dot.com with my great looks and holiday pictures from Chamonix!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...