Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tory lead has halved again now to only 5% in the

> poll in the Times today - they are projected now

> to lose seats: poll suggests a majority of only 2.

> Pound is falling sharply.


Every time there's any increased likelihood of JC and his ex Diane getting into power, the pound falls sharply. Hardly news and hardly any surprise now is it?!

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> jaywalker Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Tory lead has halved again now to only 5% in

> the

> > poll in the Times today - they are projected

> now

> > to lose seats: poll suggests a majority of only

> 2.

> > Pound is falling sharply.

>

> Every time there's any increased likelihood of JC

> and his ex Diane getting into power, the pound

> falls sharply. Hardly news and hardly any

> surprise now is it?!


That's because of more uncertainty/hung parliament


The markets wanted a soft brexit and hoped a large majority would see to that.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > > > Pound is falling sharply.

> >

> > Every time there's any increased likelihood of

> JC

> > and his ex Diane getting into power, the pound

> > falls sharply. Hardly news and hardly any

> > surprise now is it?!

>

> That's because of more uncertainty/hung

> parliament

>

> The markets wanted a soft brexit and hoped a large

> majority would see to that.


Really? C'mon - let's be serious for a moment!

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well. unfortunately, it's a negative vote - ie

> strategic voting against who you most don't want

> to win.

>

> Personally, I;d like the green party to have more

> seats but in terms of the main parties, that vote

> would be lost and better used. Which is really

> pants.


Yes, this is a particularly worrying election because the usual imaginary veneer of 'making the right choice' has well and truly been erased by the crushing realisation that 'there is no good choice to make'.


The best outcome in this circumstance would be a hung parliament. May would have to resign immediately. The new centre-left would be large enough to form a new party with centre-right Tories (Clarke as PM probably given that the Lib Dems seem to be about to be annihilated). The Brexiteers can then be sent back to the periphery of politics where they belong. Let's hope there is enough tactical voting to secure this.

"The Brexiteers can then be sent back to the periphery of politics where they belong."


Ah, the pompous metropolitan bubble's sneering approach to the majority of the people that voted in the referendum comes out again. No wonder people outside London think we are w*****rs. It was 52% of the population that voted to leave, you numpty. I imagine they don't think they belong "on the periphery of politics" as you so confidently and condescendingly say.


I didn't vote to leave, but I must confess that I find your sort of pompous sneering intolerable and embarrassing.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The Brexiteers can then be sent back to the

> periphery of politics where they belong."

>

> Ah, the pompous metropolitan bubble's sneering...It

> was 52% of the population that voted to leave, you

> numpty.


I dunno how you get to the conclusion there's a metropolitan remain bubble when 48% of the UK voted remain and 40% of London voted leave.


(You numpty).

Seriously - you 'dunno'? Then I suggest you go and read a bit. A huge number of commentators have suggested the Brexit leave vote was to some extent a reaction to the sneering of the metropolitan liberal elite living in their bubble. I'm amazed you have not seen that anywhere. Oh, by the way, quoting that particular statistic about London, completely misses the point that not everyone in London is part of the (sneering) liberal elite. It is therefore a very bad point.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyone who works for the police could have told

> you she was a train crash long before she became

> prime minister. The Fact she will still wipe the

> floor with Labour at this election is surely

> enough to tell even the most enthusiastic Corbyn

> supporter that their direction of travel is the

> wrong way. You would hope.

>

> Louisa.



Agree completely with this.


Corbyn is actually having a good go at this, but he still has no chance. People are getting excited about the pools, but the vast majority of people barely think about politics, and they have swallowed the strong and stable bullshit and that Corbyn is a disaster, and they will vote as such because of brexit.


It's all just a bit shit.

He has been a bit of knob (JP), but there again that it why he is there.


I was actually more struck by the ad for on-line bingo after Corbyn. What have we become?


I may have a slight adiction to social media, but I am not losing my shirt. That would be a good question, not would you get rid of the monarchy? (where I am with Corbyn, agreeing that this is a low priority) but what would you do to control on-line betting? Oh and payday loans? Oh and cheap alcohol? I'm on a roll.

Mrs May, why did you try to stop the government publishng it's air quality plan?, and why do you need to intervene in/clear virtually every other important decision since you came into power? Why does everything that your government do have to be seen to be popular? Why are you bally hedging your bets in your answers??? (and I very much expect that I wont, and cannot, vote for the three main parties (and UKIP and the Greens)).
On balance think Paxman adopted the same hectoring tone with TM and to me it just reinforced how autocratic her manner is. She looks visibly shaken when confronted with things like changing her mind on important policy announcements and her querulous voice doesn't help. No one pressed her on unnecessarily revisiting fox hunting and the ?350m to the NHS was given a very gentle ride I felt. Think the show wrongly billed Paxman as one of the stars and he feels he has to live up to his (outdated) image. For me, Corbyn came out of it the winner.
Agree Paxman was really annoying, but equally to both... Corbyn did a fairly good job, May was a bit wobbly methinks, but then she was arguably in a more difficult position as the sitting governmant. Her main (only?) line is trying to make people fear Corbyn mishandling the Brexit negotiations, she brought these up at every point where she was challenged by questions she didn't have an answer for.

He (JP) was like an infant defiantly not letting

go of something to th point it had lost its meaning. Weird .

I'm surprised nothing was mentioned about how our government acted unlawfully at dealing with detained fast tracking of asylum seekers. Both parties should have had the decency to put accross there position and the reality of the damage that was possibly done.


https://www.freemovement.org.uk/rules-under-which-over-10000-fast-track-asylum-appeals-decided-declared-unlawful/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...