Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Wood was very weak last night.

Rudd was off her face and out of her depth

Farron needsto be chained to a radiator for several years with terry waites

Nuttall is clearly looking forward to the new Reich

Corbyn is obviously planning his retirement

The Scotch were full of Buckfast and spoiling for a fight at the carry oot afterwards

Greens: meh

George Osborne still trolling Theresa May tweeting (about a London poll)


"1st edition @EveningStandard has our shock @YouGov London poll with Corbyn now ahead of May as 'best PM'"


https://twitter.com/George_Osborne/status/870236254377562112/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com%2Fpolitics%2Flive%2F2017%2Fjun%2F01%2Fgeneral-election-2017-may-absence-leaders-debate-brexit-politics-live

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway one of my favorite comments of the BBC

> debate

>

> Paul Nuttall: I'm not paying the EU any divorce

> settlements - we've paid the EU enough as

> members.

> Leanne Wood: Would you treat your wife like that

> Paul.


Classic.


They should do a compilation of the best (worst) bits of the Campaign, just like they do best bits of the Olympics.

What music to set it to, though?

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I would've thought 'no deal' was as bad as it

> gets, so I'd like to know what this 'bad deal' I

> keep hearing is likely to mean. In what way will

> it be worse than 'no deal', anyone know?...



About time someone addressed this meaningless Tory soundbite...


Jeremy Corbyn says there is "no such thing as no deal" when Britain leaves the EU.


"Theresa May says no deal is better than a bad deal - let's be clear, no deal is in fact a bad deal. It's the worst of all deals," he said, adding that it would leave Britain having World Trade Organisation tariffs and restrictions, instead of the access to European markets that it needs.


"Theresa May's approach risks a jobs meltdown across Britain," he says.


By contrast, he said, Labour would negotiate a tariff-free deal that benefits both sides

Re- brexit. I like the potential Labour negotiating team of Starmer, Thorberry and Gardiner. Gardiner particularly has been impressive in recent weeks.


But, has Corbyn made a big balls up today insisting that he won't do deals, coalitions, agreements with any other parties? Does he really think he's going to win a majority with 7 days left.


There's just the merest glimmer of hope for a hung parliament and surely his comments are ill-advised in that case?


Someone please correct me if i'm missing something.


Edit: I've been corrected. he was talking about now, not post-election.

With Labour chasing down the Tories lead, he was right to say that, it's now all about perceived momentum (no pun intended), win your own votes first and worry about the others later. He could always do a u-turn in the 'national interest', it's not like he could be called out by the Tories for doing so...

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re- brexit. I like the potential Labour

> negotiating team of Starmer, Thorberry and

> Gardiner. Gardiner particularly has been

> impressive in recent weeks.

>

> But, has Corbyn made a big balls up today

> insisting that he won't do deals, coalitions,

> agreements with any other parties? Does he really

> think he's going to win a majority with 7 days

> left.

>

> There's just the merest glimmer of hope for a hung

> parliament and surely his comments are ill-advised

> in that case?

>

> Someone please correct me if i'm missing

> something.

>

> Edit: I've been corrected. he was talking about

> now, not post-election.


Thornberry today said he'd make a queens speech and let the

other parties decide whether to support it. Corbyn seemed

to agree,



http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/labour-would-try-govern-britain-13124551


Edit: What if Tories are largest and vote of no confidence is passed

though - not mentioned :)

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re- brexit. I like the potential Labour

> negotiating team of Starmer, Thorberry and

> Gardiner. Gardiner particularly has been

> impressive in recent weeks.

>


That's his top team really.


Starmer has been intelligent in his roll against Davis

Gardiner has been excellent sniping this campaign

Theresa May has been awful... just awful. Meaningless soundbites. Nauseating nationalist jargon. No acknowledgement of where/how things are going wrong in this country.


I must admit I'm starting to admire Corbyn. He's ran a good campaign, and at least he's put together a bold manifesto that actually offers some kind of vision. He's got a lot better in front of the camera, he's gained confidence and authority, and when he talks he offers substance.


But I can't agree with the mass nationalisation programme, and the manifesto "costings" seem like finger-in-the-air stuff. Still leaning towards the homophobic god botherer.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Theresa May has been awful... just awful.

> Meaningless soundbites. Nauseating nationalist

> jargon. No acknowledgement of where/how things are

> going wrong in this country.

>

> I must admit I'm starting to admire Corbyn. He's

> ran a good campaign, and at least he's put

> together a bold manifesto that actually offers

> some kind of vision. He's got a lot better in

> front of the camera, he's gained confidence and

> authority, and when he talks he offers substance.

>

> But I can't agree with the mass nationalisation

> programme, and the manifesto "costings" seem like

> finger-in-the-air stuff. Still leaning towards the

> homophobic god botherer.


But computer technology has changed (the illusion that services ran better because of privatisation - Moore's Law was the confounding variable). So many nationalised railways now run to very good time and service. This argument extends to other natural monopolies (including water and Broadband provision).

Emma Thornberry was very effective on Newsnight last night. She is certainly in command of her brief and has a good rapport with the audience. Not seen her before. With Starmer and Gardiner she would make a strong team.


However, the main point is that if there is no overall majority then there will be tectonic plate movements in politics. Neither May nor Corbyn will be involved in the new continents.

jaywalker... I'm a bit on the fence about railway renationalisation... I'm sure many public railways work very well indeed. Several private ones do too. I wouldn't necessarily advocate privatisation in the first place (as you say, natural monopoly), but I think there are other ways of addressing the problems.


Similar with utilities... I've no ideological problem with private ownership but there are serious issues with the way the industry has been set up and regulated.


And it all seems like it's going to be very, very expensive. Especially with utilities, I think John McDonnell was suggesting they'd buy the shares up...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...