Jump to content

Cleaners recommended Urszula + Monika


Stan

Recommended Posts

I'd like to recommend Urszula who has been cleaning my flat for years and I now consider a friend. First of she is NICE...and that means a good person, decent, honest and has a nice personality. I think this is important because they are in your home cleaning and you want to trust them and like them.

Secondly she is good at her job, reliable and generally cool. She is a hard working mum and has a great sense of humour.


She has joined up with Monika who I don't personally know but imagine she is great too.


These two ladies work very hard and deserve their fledgling business union to do well.


Please support them.

Urszula 07873617266

Monika 07484 709499

I can also vouch for Ula who has been cleaning for us for years. She is hardworking, absolutely reliable, takes initiative on many things and is a great person.

She is looking for some extra hours.

Ula has a car so is able to get around and works for a few families in the area.


I am happy to provide further references if needed, you can just message me and I will supply my contact details.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Do you have a link to this? The only one i could find was on the 24th July
    • Yes and I heard the other day that there is a higher conviction rate with trials heard by only a judge, vs juries, which makes sense when you think about it.  Also - call me cynical - I can't help but think that this justice reform story was thrown out to overshadow the Reeves / OBR / Budget story.  But I do agree with scrapping juries for fraud cases. 
    • judges are, by definition, a much narrower strata of society. The temptation to "rattle through" numbers, regardless of right, wrong or justice is fundamentally changed If we trust judges that much, why have we ever bothered with juries in the first place? (that's a rhetorical question btw - there is no sane answer which goes along the lines of "good point, judges only FTW"
    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...