Jump to content

Recommended Posts

My two month old son is showing interest in toys etc and thought it would be a good time to invest in a baby gym. He has got an old hand me down but most of the toys are missing so this would be a belated xmas present.


Which one should I go for? There's a bewildering array out there and the one I like (Lamaze pyramid gym) does not have any space for him to roll etc.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15149-best-baby-gym/
Share on other sites

We have the Fisher Price Rainforest gym, which is garish but great, with not too awful music choices (in fact the rainforest noises are quite relaxing!). And my very large nearly 5 month old managed to roll in it yesterday several times!


This is the cheapest place at the mo, we got ours from Amazon.


http://www.babycity.co.uk/gyms-playmats-tummy-time-activity-gyms/fisher-price/fisher-price-rainforest-melodies-lights-deluxe-gym-pd-1425.html?pageId=pd&utm_source=Froogle&utm_medium=marketing_medium&utm_campaign=froogle_feed

3rd comment for the rainforest gym - lil bugglet loves chatting to the butterflies and we've "customised" it by adding few other toys off the loops (favourite being Emily). Really like the fact that all the hanging toys that come with the gym do something (rattle/spin/have bell) which has reinforced/encouraged her developing motor skills - at 3.5mths I can now see why they call it a baby gym!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...