Jump to content

Recommended Posts

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Should'nt be allowed full stop


And why is that, if you don't mind my asking?


TFL's report concluded it did not prove dangerous for cyclists.



- a popularist move

> by Boris, and I resonded to the consultation. Nor

> electric cars.


On what bus lanes are electric cars allowed? I am not aware of any. Allowing electric cars would be wrong because electric cars, regardless of how green they are, cause the same congestion of petrol cars, whereas motorcycles do not!


> Why the comment motorbike hating cyclists? We all

> have to get on together and generally do.


? What comment?

In my experience when one respects the other, it works for all involved. I commute daily on a motorbike into central london and make sure not to stop in the cycle box as well es leaving some room away from the kerb to allow cyclists to move to the front of the queue.


I agree with the north of london bridge being clogged up, but generally by all kind of traffic participants, due to the ongoing building work.

Caesi01 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> In my experience when one respects the other, it

> works for all involved. I commute daily on a

> motorbike into central london and make sure not to

> stop in the cycle box as well es leaving some room

> away from the kerb to allow cyclists to move to

> the front of the queue.

>

> I agree with the north of london bridge being

> clogged up, but generally by all kind of traffic

> participants, due to the ongoing building work.



I wouldn't ever wish to tar all with one brush. A lot of motorcyclists are the most accommodating vehicles on the road. And yeah, that building work is a nightmare. And seems to have been going on forever.

Ah 'minorit' of motorbike hating cyclists. Apologies didn't read this, there are so many blanket statements made on this site.


So I am definitely and ass for ass-uming.


EV (electric vehicle) access to bus lanes is being proposed and may already be happening eg in Milton Keynes. And in Norway. Watch this space.

It's going to be absolute carnage on Monday morning going north across London Bridge when the bank intersection is shut to all except buses and cycles !!


https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/services/transport-and-streets/traffic-management/Documents/Bank%20on%20Safety%20Map.pdf

bobbsy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's going to be absolute carnage on Monday

> morning going north across London Bridge when the

> bank intersection is shut to all except buses and

> cycles !!

>

> https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/services/transport

> -and-streets/traffic-management/Documents/Bank%20o

> n%20Safety%20Map.pdf


So, cars, vans, taxis and lorries are still going to be allowed across the bridge? You're right, the congestion will be horrendous. I carry on up gracechurch street and that'll be so clogged up. I might switch and start going across Tower Bridge- i used to.

Yes - looks like all traffic as normal except effectively all the traffic that would normally head up King William st will need to turn onto Cannon St or around to Gracechurch St. There is a still a lot of building work along Cannon St - that road can't handle the volume of traffic at the moment even while Bank is as usual.


Coming home in peak will be even more horrendous I think. A lot of traffic will divert to Blackfriars Bridge which is already a roadblock much of the time.


The irony is - Bank intersection, IMO, is a relatively free flowing intersection 90% of the time. The last few morning it has been calm and pleasant riding through there.

Someone wrote "Bus Lanes are dedicated to buses to allow free moving public transport."

That was my point though: around The Oval area and other stretches of road, busses now have to join cars and motorcycles on one lane while bicycles have a lane all to themselves. Somehow now even Busses are not important in TfL's eyes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In the country, where I have relocated to these things and dealing with council  for all matters are dealt with  in days… freely admit less population than london. Certainly faster in everything.  Not surprised at all about Thames Water - remember years ago calling them about a leak in road - then it took a week for them to come out, despite daily calls from me. Disgusting at that time the lack of concern and wastage of water. Unbelievable that they are not held to account fir anything and that goes for Southwark Council as well.
    • But without knowing the cause of the repeated leaks, it's impossible to comment really. Poor repairs? Something wrong further up the system? Lack of maintenance?  When one of the leaks in our road recurred shortly after it had been repaired, a TW guy said to me that the repairers must have jumped too hard on the asphalt (?) laid above the point of the repair when they were getting it to settle (?) and broken the repair. I wasn't sure if he was joking or not 🤣
    • But in many cases the leaks are happening in the same places again and again, and every inch of pipe outside the Horniman on the South Circular must have been replaced at least 3 times in the last 15 years! Of course the infrastructure in some areas is old, but locally there's been quite a bit of replacement. To little effect it would seem. 
    • Thank you, Pugwash. That's really useful information. Do you know who was responsible for the locks and keys, or which council department? Could you PM me if you don't want to put someone's personal details on here?  It may save me having to speak to Monica. Thanks.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...