Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is sprung from the sale of a rabbit skin coat, which divided the board and the Admin were kept busy deleting inappropriate posts.


Here's my view,


I'm glad this has sold and someone is enjoying the beauty of it. Rabbit fur is one type of fur we shouldn't be sniffy about. It makes me wonder if people who worry about wearing rabbit skin, worry about wearing cow skin or sitting on cow skin? The argument that leather is a by product of the meat industry doesn't stand. In that rabbits are considered a source of food, at least I hope that's why a brace hung in the butchers back home. If we don't eat them, they are used for pet food too. So why should their skins go to waste?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15358-rabbit-fur-coat-discussion/
Share on other sites

I agree that if the animal has been killed for it's meat, then using the skin for clothing and upholstery is just making efficient use of the animal.


I don't like the idea of slaughtering animals specifically for their fur, but if it's a second hand coat anyway... it may as well get used, it's rather too late for the rabbits.

The problem is that it's getting rather difficult to get hold of a decent furrier nowadays, because they've all been driven out of business or can be contacted only through a network of shady men in pubs. I have about 20 cat furs in my shed that i'd like to turn into a bedspread, if anyone knows someone who could help.
KK, thanks for the tip. Some of them are quite big but not in that league! Maybe a bedspread for a child's bed? I am sure the collection will have grown a little by the time I find a reliable furrier in any case so I may have enough by then. The forum is a source of valuable info on where to find fresh ones.

I care very much about animal rights but I don't see any problem with wearing VINTAGE fur. I'd never buy NEW fur, especially if it's from an animal which isn't used for it's meat. It seems to me as bad as killing Rhinos for their horns, or Sharks for their finns.


I think people were very harsh at the woman selling the coat, you find vintage fur sold at most vintage fairs/markets/shops- would those people have a pop at the owners of these places or was she just an easy target because she's online?


I also can't be historically accurate in this but I'm wondering if people would have eaten the rabbits back in the day? if it was more likely that rabbits were used for their meat?

I was once verbally abused on a train for wearing a fake leopard fur coat.


I was so taken aback I couldn't think of a suitable reply.


I think it's interesting the change of popular feeling re fur. I used to have a second hand - sorry, vintage - fur coat in the late seventies/early eighties. I wore it proudly for several years until I realised I was being treated like a criminal in some quarters, and I stopped wearing it.


For years, you would never see people selling these coats, but now they're back - one of the stalls on North Cross Road had a whole rack of them the other week, and models have started wearing fur again.


So what changed exactly?


My own feeling is that wearing an old fur is fine - the animal's already long dead after all, and why waste a good coat. They're very warm (obviously, that's why animals have fur I presume).


But I don't like the idea of animals being farmed purely for their fur, or being killed purely for their fur, and I wouldn't want to wear anything made of that fur.


I do eat meat, but if I am buying it myself I will only buy stuff which I know is free range.

I have read certain arguments with regard to the wearing of vintage fur, and to some extent fake, fur, and I?m repeating them here not as my own viewpoint, but to add to the discussion since people are asking why wearing vintage fur is wrong. Please don?t take me to task on it, as I?ve no intention of arguing about it.


The wearing of vintage/fake fur perpetuates the desirability of fur as a fashion item and creates demand. This increases the likelihood that animals will be farmed for their fur, and hence perpetuate the cruelty to the animals.


Sue ? that might be why you received abuse regarding your fake fur.


Personally, I wouldn?t wear vintage fur, whether rabbit or anything else. I don?t eat meat but do eat fish (I eat what I like, avoid what I don?t) and I do wear leather. I dislike cruelty to animals, and I?m well aware of the double standard in that, but have learnt to live with it. I don?t really like the look of real fur, as it just makes me think of the beautiful animal it was once on (albeit a long time ago), and it reminds me of rich old ladies.

zeban Wrote:


> I also can't be historically accurate in this but

> I'm wondering if people would have eaten the

> rabbits back in the day? if it was more likely

> that rabbits were used for their meat?


Absolutely, rabbit was very popular in the wartime, where it was caught and eaten with no problem, due it's classification as vermin.

I remember growing up and my dad and brother going rabbiting and bringing them back for dinner.

And I very much enjoy eating rabbit now.


Fur / cheese - don't see the difference myself (we don't need to wear fur, some would argue, and it's only ugly vanity. But neither do we need to eat cheese.)


Edited to add, I think that's the point Huguenot was making in post 2. So I'm just copying him basically.

Are rabbit fur coats so different (in essence) from the very popular, hugely expensive, extemely practical, seen all over London UGG Boots?


I own a pair but don't own a rabbit fur coat. I've never really liked fur coats but sheepskin boots are very practical in the winter.


Is this a fair comparison?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
    • I'm a bit of an architecture geek and I must confess I find it one of the most gimmicky ugly redesigns I've seen in a while. I'm always open to quirky but this is just not nice in any way shape or form.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...