Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can't resist, sorry.

> The Postcodes define it all. If your address is

> SE15 you ain't in Dulwich.

> Peckham Rye PARK is SE22

> Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15.

> (The Peckham Society get very excited about this

> when someone gets it wrong.)


Neat wind-up.


The copy of the 1799 map I gave you has a blue line that shows the Friern Manor boundary. The other side of the blue line is Buckingham Manor.


I have uploaded a scan of the relevant area of the map for those who have not seen the full map.


The offer of free copies still stands.


The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until later.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can't resist, sorry.

> The Postcodes define it all. If your address is

> SE15 you ain't in Dulwich.

> Peckham Rye PARK is SE22

> Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15.

> (The Peckham Society get very excited about this

> when someone gets it wrong.)

> There are two roads called Peckham Rye: the East

> side is SE15 (odd Numbers) and the west side is

> SE22 (even numbers).

>

> Nunhead really should have been given its own

> postcode but of course it shares Peckham's being

> SE15.

>

> Meanwhile, postcodes go alphabetically. But NW1

> SW1 E1 SE1 N1 (NE is outside of London) are the

> areas closest to the centre. But then they start

> from A again after a while.

> So you have:

>

> SE2 Abbey Wood

> SE3 Blackheath

> SE4 BROCKLEY

> SE5 Camberwell

> SE6 Catford

> SE7 Charlton

> SE8 Deptford

> SE9 ELTHAM

> SE10 Greenwich

> SE11 KENNINGTON

> Se12 Lee

> SE13 Lewisham

> SE14 New Cross

> SE15 PECKHAM

> SE16 Rotherhithe

> SE17 WALWORTH/E&C

> SE18

> SE19 NORWOOD?

> SE20

> Se21 Dulwich

> SE22 EAST Dulwich

> SE23 Forest Hill

> SE24 who cares

> SE25 Lost Interest now.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PeckhamRose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can't resist, sorry.

> > The Postcodes define it all. If your address is

> > SE15 you ain't in Dulwich.

> > Peckham Rye PARK is SE22

> > Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15.

> > (The Peckham Society get very excited about

> this

> > when someone gets it wrong.)

>

> Neat wind-up.

>

> The copy of the 1799 map I gave you has a blue

> line that shows the Friern Manor boundary. The

> other side of the blue line is Buckingham Manor.

>

> I have uploaded a scan of the relevant area of the

> map for those who have not seen the full map.

>

> The offer of free copies still stands.

>

> The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until

> later.



The problem with your argument is that boundaries change. By your logic, none of us live in London, because there will be a map somewhere showing it. Sorry but post codes are the modern boundaries. SE15 = Peckham.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for this. We love our map, but have little

> wall space left!



In 1865 there was a House of Lords inquiry into the theft of Peckham Rye Common land by the Lord of The Manor. At para 3259 of the minutes is corroboration of the map details.


A comparison of the map scan with a modern map shows how much land was stolen, described as "small encroachments" at para 3274.


We also have the matter of leaseholders' gravel extraction rights. It's good to get a another confirmation that the Lambeth Group underlies the common and not London Clay.


[bTW there is nothing in subsequent legislation to suggest that the leaseholders' mineral rights were extinguished]


The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until later.

Otta Wrote:

>

> The problem with your argument is that boundaries

> change. By your logic, none of us live in London,

> because there will be a map somewhere showing it.

> Sorry but post codes are the modern boundaries.

> SE15 = Peckham.


I understand your argument that Nunhead ceased to exist in 1917 when it was allocated a SE15 post code.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...