Jump to content

Recommended Posts

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can't resist, sorry.

> The Postcodes define it all. If your address is

> SE15 you ain't in Dulwich.

> Peckham Rye PARK is SE22

> Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15.

> (The Peckham Society get very excited about this

> when someone gets it wrong.)


Neat wind-up.


The copy of the 1799 map I gave you has a blue line that shows the Friern Manor boundary. The other side of the blue line is Buckingham Manor.


I have uploaded a scan of the relevant area of the map for those who have not seen the full map.


The offer of free copies still stands.


The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until later.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can't resist, sorry.

> The Postcodes define it all. If your address is

> SE15 you ain't in Dulwich.

> Peckham Rye PARK is SE22

> Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15.

> (The Peckham Society get very excited about this

> when someone gets it wrong.)

> There are two roads called Peckham Rye: the East

> side is SE15 (odd Numbers) and the west side is

> SE22 (even numbers).

>

> Nunhead really should have been given its own

> postcode but of course it shares Peckham's being

> SE15.

>

> Meanwhile, postcodes go alphabetically. But NW1

> SW1 E1 SE1 N1 (NE is outside of London) are the

> areas closest to the centre. But then they start

> from A again after a while.

> So you have:

>

> SE2 Abbey Wood

> SE3 Blackheath

> SE4 BROCKLEY

> SE5 Camberwell

> SE6 Catford

> SE7 Charlton

> SE8 Deptford

> SE9 ELTHAM

> SE10 Greenwich

> SE11 KENNINGTON

> Se12 Lee

> SE13 Lewisham

> SE14 New Cross

> SE15 PECKHAM

> SE16 Rotherhithe

> SE17 WALWORTH/E&C

> SE18

> SE19 NORWOOD?

> SE20

> Se21 Dulwich

> SE22 EAST Dulwich

> SE23 Forest Hill

> SE24 who cares

> SE25 Lost Interest now.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> PeckhamRose Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can't resist, sorry.

> > The Postcodes define it all. If your address is

> > SE15 you ain't in Dulwich.

> > Peckham Rye PARK is SE22

> > Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15.

> > (The Peckham Society get very excited about

> this

> > when someone gets it wrong.)

>

> Neat wind-up.

>

> The copy of the 1799 map I gave you has a blue

> line that shows the Friern Manor boundary. The

> other side of the blue line is Buckingham Manor.

>

> I have uploaded a scan of the relevant area of the

> map for those who have not seen the full map.

>

> The offer of free copies still stands.

>

> The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until

> later.



The problem with your argument is that boundaries change. By your logic, none of us live in London, because there will be a map somewhere showing it. Sorry but post codes are the modern boundaries. SE15 = Peckham.

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for this. We love our map, but have little

> wall space left!



In 1865 there was a House of Lords inquiry into the theft of Peckham Rye Common land by the Lord of The Manor. At para 3259 of the minutes is corroboration of the map details.


A comparison of the map scan with a modern map shows how much land was stolen, described as "small encroachments" at para 3274.


We also have the matter of leaseholders' gravel extraction rights. It's good to get a another confirmation that the Lambeth Group underlies the common and not London Clay.


[bTW there is nothing in subsequent legislation to suggest that the leaseholders' mineral rights were extinguished]


The matter of the SE15 post code can wait until later.

Otta Wrote:

>

> The problem with your argument is that boundaries

> change. By your logic, none of us live in London,

> because there will be a map somewhere showing it.

> Sorry but post codes are the modern boundaries.

> SE15 = Peckham.


I understand your argument that Nunhead ceased to exist in 1917 when it was allocated a SE15 post code.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...