Jump to content

Recommended Posts

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Clearly the most effective way to reduce spending

> is to eliminate anyone over 65 in a one off budget

> rebalancing cull. Apart from reducing the pensions

> bill, this will solve the housing crisis as well

> as the NHS capacity issues.


Not concerned when you hit 65?

May as well ban families of more than two children, introduce gender screening to ensure there is the correct balance and make entire families live together in a community forever rather than insist the new adults fly the nest at the earliest opportunity *sigh

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Clearly the most effective way to reduce spending

> is to eliminate anyone over 65 in a one off budget

> rebalancing cull. Apart from reducing the pensions

> bill, this will solve the housing crisis as well

> as the NHS capacity issues.


Why stop with eliminating the old? - eliminate the sick, the disabled, the poor & the unemployed & you can have your ideal eugenicist utopia that the gallant Nazi cousins fought for. Then the ?258billion saved would build all the houses that were needed - solution all round. Fixed.

Way back in the 1970s the WRP had a manifesto which included setting up a workers' militia instead of the police, locking everyone up who was a drug addict or alcoholic- because apparently in their 'utopia' people would not need these escapes - some of the members I met were teachers, Vanessa Redgrave and her late brother, Robert Powell popped up at a spring fair fund raiser, and Mungo Jerry (the band) played at the conference.

These ideas do not go away- their adherents are just better than they used to be at hiding them...

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Way back in the 1970s the WRP had a manifesto

> which included setting up a workers' militia

> instead of the police, locking everyone up who was

> a drug addict or alcoholic- because apparently in

> their 'utopia' people would not need these escapes

> - some of the members I met were teachers, Vanessa

> Redgrave and her late brother, Robert Powell

> popped up at a spring fair fund raiser, and Mungo

> Jerry (the band) played at the conference.

> These ideas do not go away- their adherents are

> just better than they used to be at hiding them...


Way back in the 1960s some Tory candidates campaigned with the slogan "If you want a nigger neighbour, vote Labour." These ideas don't go away, and their adherents don't even bother trying to hide them.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> uncleglen Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Way back in the 1970s the WRP had a manifesto

> > which included setting up a workers' militia

> > instead of the police, locking everyone up who

> was

> > a drug addict or alcoholic- because apparently

> in

> > their 'utopia' people would not need these

> escapes

> > - some of the members I met were teachers,

> Vanessa

> > Redgrave and her late brother, Robert Powell

> > popped up at a spring fair fund raiser, and

> Mungo

> > Jerry (the band) played at the conference.

> > These ideas do not go away- their adherents are

> > just better than they used to be at hiding

> them...

>

> Way back in the 1960s some Tory candidates

> campaigned with the slogan "If you want a nigger

> neighbour, vote Labour." These ideas don't go

> away, and their adherents don't even bother trying

> to hide them.


You just can't resist the urge to scratch that itch you have ,can you? Or is pouring salt in your own wounds?

Green Goose Wrote:


> You just can't resist the urge to scratch that

> itch you have ,can you? Or is pouring salt in your

> own wounds?


Just to save you time and trolling energy, after this message I've decided to ignore your childish attempts at provocation in the same way I'm now deleting your tedious private messages unread - do stop sending them, even you must have better things to do with your life than to harass people who couldn't care less about your opinions via private message. If you ever have anything to say which is actually relevant to discussion, do post it - in public - and I'll be glad to debate. Until then, your drivel will be ignored, both publicly and privately.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Green Goose Wrote:

>

> > You just can't resist the urge to scratch that

> > itch you have ,can you? Or is pouring salt in

> your

> > own wounds?

>

> Just to save you time and trolling energy, after

> this message I've decided to ignore your childish

> attempts at provocation in the same way I'm now

> deleting your tedious private messages unread - do

> stop sending them, even you must have better

> things to do with your life than to harass people

> who couldn't care less about your opinions via

> private message. If you ever have anything to say

> which is actually relevant to discussion, do post

> it - in public - and I'll be glad to debate.

> Until then, your drivel will be ignored, both

> publicly and privately.


You get PMs? I feel strangely jealous! ;-)


*suggests a group hug... ?

Lordship 516 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> miga Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Clearly the most effective way to reduce

> spending

> > is to eliminate anyone over 65 in a one off

> budget

> > rebalancing cull. Apart from reducing the

> pensions

> > bill, this will solve the housing crisis as

> well

> > as the NHS capacity issues.

>

> Why stop with eliminating the old? - eliminate the

> sick, the disabled, the poor & the unemployed &

> you can have your ideal eugenicist utopia that

> the gallant Nazi cousins fought for. Then the

> ?258billion saved would build all the houses that

> were needed - solution all round. Fixed.


Let's not over reach, one group at a time. We've done the immigrants, let's do the elderly next and see where we end up, yeah?

Winder Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> One sees the odd house with a poster in the window

> or a bill board in the front yard saying " VOTE

> for ****".

>

> Is this naff or should we all be doing it?


One of the houses on my street has stuck up handwritten anti-Labour messages that they've had their young children write / draw. Things about 'no magic money tree' and 'McDonnell is a Marxist' etc.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and some of them are right up top of your party =

> policy, advisors, McDonnells secret army



Yeah, I know...I know.

V

Honestly? I generally try to be a moderate. I hold strident views on certain things but for the most part I believe in the value of compromise and cooperation, there are times when I recognise my view is not the majority view and I accept that. I live in a democracy and while I'm free to argue my case and complain about the outcome, losing sometimes is part of that. I also don't subscribe to the narrative that the Tory party is evil personified. I disagree with a large parts of what they do, but I also like having free and fair elections and so again, losing is sometimes part of the price I pay for living where I do.


But a strong Labour Party - or any party - has a role to play as effective opposition, without which any government can run amoke. But I'm very nervous about what will emerge the other side of the GE. I simply don't understand some of what Corbyn is doing. I keep thinking that somehow Labour will suddenly coalesce into this coherent and unified party with a sense of purpose and an understanding of the electorate.


And then Dianne Abbott gets on TV again and I'm reminded that however principled and honourable Jeremy Corbym might believe himself to be, he's surrounded by some complete tools.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...