Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I loved the stuff about getting the baby to love your boob...I wish I had read all that when I was struggling with my non-latching tongue-tied baby a month or so ago. Inspirational and lods of lovely ideas, inc for those whose baby never becomes fully bf but instead feeds a little for "comfort"

I can never understand why so many people discourage comfort sucking and frown on it so much. Gina Ford advises never to let a baby suck on an empty breast (which just shows she's not the most knowledgeable anyway, b/c the breast is never truly empty as long as you're lactating...). And the nurse at my local GP's practice actually told me not to let my baby comfort suck! (She also told me bfing should stop when Baby gets teeth b/c breastmilk is bad for teeth. What utter rubbish. Breastmilk actually has antibacterial properties.


I totally agree there should be more support for bfing. And there should be more acceptance for different styles of bfing. I like the La Leche philosophy that every mother-baby dyad is different.


Bravo to the mum in the blog who got her infant to suckle at such an advanced age. I know Little Saff would still reflexively head-bob for the breast around 4/4.5 months. Even my lactation consultant was surprised (and pleased) to see the reflex still present at such a late date.


We all have so much for to learn (and share) about feeding babies.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a comment on the dentist thread about

> breastmilk being bad for teeth, because it's

> sugary.



think it is a debated topic... research to say it's protective but i don't think all night sucking is wise just in case!

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> There was a comment on the dentist thread about

> breastmilk being bad for teeth, because it's

> sugary.



While it's true that breastmilk has sugar (lactose) in it, 'sugary' is a relative term, and it is inaccurate and misleading to use it to describe breastmilk from a scientific POV. Antibodies and other proteins in whole fresh breastmilk counteract the effect of bacteria in the mouth. Both immersion testing (Erickson et al 1999) and in situ testing (Tinanoff N. et al) have shown whole breast milk to be not dissimilar to water in its effect on teeth.


Moreover neither extended nighttime nursing/bfing to sleep (Torney PH 1992), nor bfing older children (Alaluusua 1990), has been correlated with an increase in dental caries. So if your LO will only latch/suckle well at night (Little Saff was a night nurser until about 10 mo!), there's actually no need to worry about the effect on their teeth as long as you follow a good brushing routine.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...