Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Except the EU won't negotiate this until the divorce bill is agreed and the status of EU nationals is agreed. I don't understand what part of that this the government doesn't understand. The EU have consistently stated this from the start. How long is the UK going to wait before discussing these things? They have already wasted almost 5 months and agreed on nothing. But what is very clear, is all the nonsense about no deal being ok really is nonsense that will cost UK business and the economy dear, and the Tories know it.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Except the EU won't negotiate this until the

> divorce bill is agreed ..."

>

> True. But as I've said before, any agreement on

> the divorce bill ought to be conditional. Not one

> cent to the EU until a trade deal acceptable to

> the UK Parliament is agreed.



Just f&cking hurry up tho, as I'm here in Spain trying to get a number of deals done and this Brexshit malarkey is costing me.

Worse still the rest of those doing business here just don't get us, and I don't get us.


It's all very well perambulating when it 'doesn't actually' personally cost you anything. However, the Tory cnuuunts who aren't actually in business dont seem to actually grasp the damage they're inflicting.


#LockUpBoris

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Except the EU won't negotiate this until the

> divorce bill is agreed ..."

>

> True. But as I've said before, any agreement on

> the divorce bill ought to be conditional. Not one

> cent to the EU until a trade deal acceptable to

> the UK Parliament is agreed.


Then you are asking for no deal. We are leaving the EU, not the other way round remember. Holding any divorce bill to ransom on a trade deal is only going to piss the EU off. They will never go for it. And you have to remember that any agreement is subject not only to our own parliament, but also the 27 members of the EU parliament agreeing too. Time is running out for getting any of this done. We can not leave it to the 11th hour. Trade agreements are very complex to negotiate in themselves, because every single good or service to be included has to be negotiated. There is no such thing as a free trade deal. CETA, which took ten years to negotiate, excludes a whole raft of things from tariff free trade. Only access to the single market delivers a 100% free trade agreement. And it is the time it takes to negotiate trade deals that is the reason behind the request for a transitional period lasting however many years it takes to get new trade deals in place. The cost to UK business of WTO tariffs is just too high a price to pay.

"...And you have to remember that any agreement is subject not only to our own parliament, but also the 27 members of the EU parliament agreeing too..."


It's worse than that Blah Blah, regional governments are involved as well (e.g. Belgium). I think at least 34 bodies have to give their half-arsed approval.


That said, I accept it won't be a breeze. However, there's no need for protracted 7-odd years bureaucratic agreements. Forget Junket's air-taxis wheeze. Lock the buggers in a room in a Papal conclave-style negotiation where they don't come out until they've reached agreement and I think you'll find we'll have a deal in a few weeks.

?What we are not going to do, let?s be clear, we are not going to continue the ?10 billion a year net contributions we currently have.?


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/brexit-david-davis-refuses-to-rule-out-uk-paying-to-strike-trade-deals-with-noneu-nations-a3612016.html


That's what we'll do then

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?What we are not going to do, let?s be clear, we

> are not going to continue the ?10 billion a year

> net contributions we currently have.?


Well, as net contributions are about ?8.6 billion, then we've done that already.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "...And you have to remember that any agreement is

> subject not only to our own parliament, but also

> the 27 members of the EU parliament agreeing

> too..."

>

> It's worse than that Blah Blah, regional

> governments are involved as well (e.g. Belgium). I

> think at least 34 bodies have to give their

> half-arsed approval.

>

> That said, I accept it won't be a breeze. However,

> there's no need for protracted 7-odd years

> bureaucratic agreements. Forget Junket's air-taxis

> wheeze. Lock the buggers in a room in a Papal

> conclave-style negotiation where they don't come

> out until they've reached agreement and I think

> you'll find we'll have a deal in a few weeks.


Come on Keano, as much as you write floridly about the situation you do have a history of backing flops.


This Brexit shite you've so wed yourself to is much like the handbag & hampers business you ran and failed with. You spent hours and weeks writing ad's to sell the crap you'd pinned the future on.


So as much as you try and reason and argue the position of Brexit , it'll end in a familiar place of basement sale and horse trading like you've been in before.


Only this time, spare us the effort.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Has David Davis shed a few pounds? It must be all

> the hard work he's putting in.



I reckon he thinks he's a bit of a maitn?e idol for the blue rinse brigade, aka the poor man's Des Lynam had someone punched him in the nose. But alas poor Double D, he's going head to head with Michel Barnier, all European suave, charm and sophistication. Only one winner I'm afraid, it won't be long before our Treez throws her knickers in the direction of Brussels...

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > keano77 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Hampers sold in huge deal with Spain

> >

> > Ha ha!

> >

> > Jokes, youre living off them as we speak

> >

> > Flop!

>

>

> 😀


Actually, I could do with a cup of tea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thankyou so so much tam. Your def a at angle. I was so so worried. Your a good man, we need more like your good self in the world.  Thankyou for the bottom of my heart. Pepper is pleased to be back
    • I have your cat , she’s fine , you can phone me on 07883 065 076 , I’m still up and can bring her to you now (1.15 AM Sunday) if not tonight then tomorrow afternoon or evening ? I’ve DM’d you in here as well 
    • This week's edition of The Briefing Room I found really useful and impressively informative on the training aspect.  David Aaronovitch has come a long way since his University Challenge day. 😉  It's available to hear online or download as mp3. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m002n7wv In a few days time resident doctors -who used to be known as junior doctors - were meant to be going on strike. This would be the 14th strike by the doctors’ union since March 2023. The ostensible reason was pay but now the dispute may be over without more increases to salary levels. The Government has instead made an offer to do something about the other big issue for early career doctors - working conditions and specialist training places. David Aaronovitch and guests discuss what's going on and ask what the problem is with the way we in Britain train our doctors? Guests: Hugh Pym, BBC Health Editor Sir Andrew Goddard, Consultant Gastroenterologist Professor Martin McKee, Professor of European Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Mark Dayan, Policy Analyst, Nuffield Trust. Presenter: David Aaronovitch Producers: Caroline Bayley, Kirsteen Knight, Cordelia Hemming Production Co-ordinator: Maria Ogundele Sound Engineers: Michael Regaard, Gareth Jones Editor: Richard Vadon  
    • That was one that the BBC seem to have lost track of.  But they do still have quite a few. These are some in their 60s archive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0028zp6
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...