Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Keano mate,


Don?t go putting words in my mouth now, we both know you?re not that kind of guy.



My point is that if America gets its claws into our healthcare system we will come to regret it. May has stated the ?NHS is not for sale?, but she?s flip-flopped on so much that I?m not sure I believe her.


Of course we need to have a serious and very honest national conversation about the future of our healthcare, but that?s for us to do, and if we sell parts of it to one of the most avaricious pharma-businesses ever known then we lose everything. The examples you give are extreme indeed; before we even get to those issues (and we?ll have to) there?s the fact that modern medicine is far more expensive than many people realise, and there?s not enough trained professionals to do it at the moment, because it isn?t something anyone can just drop into. When my wife was recovering from an operation for something that was killing her, I had a surprisingly frank chat with a junior doctor who said he wished they were allowed to tell people how much everything cost, in the hope that they would start to understand how lucky we are. He also bemoaned the fact that otherwise intelligent and reasonable adults would turn up at hospital expecting some kind of magical, painless cure for things, and become upset when they were told that lifestyle, diet and attitude adjustments would be part of their recovery.

Too many people just don?t understand how complex and financially draining it is. And the staff are all terrified of making a mistake.


I believe very strongly that healthcare needs to be free at the point of delivery. No system - none - is perfect, and what worked in the 50?s in plainly not fit for purpose now. I?m on genial terms with the director of a major London hospital, and his wife is a senior nurse at another major London hospital; both of them absolutely agree that the debate needs to happen, but politicians are too concerned with saying the wrong thing so they issue general platitudes but refuse to be tied down on actual policy. It infuriates them both.


The NHS has saved my mums life twice, my wife?s life once, and safely delivered both our kids as well as helping me. And it cost nothing. When we are sick we should not, in the modern world - no one should - be having to worry about paying for it. There are some things that government needs to run for the benefit of all, and healthcare is one of them.

Yes, the NHS has a lot of problems. But they are our problems to deal with. If Brexit inadvertently results in compromising our ability to fix this, then it will have failed us.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> There is a reason why, unlike the Republic of

> Ireland, the British people were not given the

> chance to vote on gay marriage. The politicians

> knew it would not pass.


As I recall, prior to gay marriage being put on the statute book, polls consistently ran at about 65-70% in favour. The reason we weren't given a vote is that that's not how our system works, whereas Eire has a written constitution that can only be amended by referenda.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A couple of small points regarding the NHS.

>

> Most of us pay National Insurance, so you can't

> say the NHS is free. We pay for it.

>


Free *at the point of delivery* is the issue. Of course we have to pay for it, everything is to be paid for somehow.

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> There is a reason why, unlike the Republic of

> Ireland, the British people were not given the

> chance to vote on gay marriage. The politicians

> knew it would not pass.


https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/poll-gay-marriage

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2013/05/20/voters-back-same-sex-marriage/

http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/4984

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And like many of the Pro Brexit brigade he?s full

> of guff

>

> If you can be bothered go and read his ?for sale?

> posts of old. They make Nicholas Parsons sound

> like a ?man of few words?.


Ah Seabag, what a pleasure.


Still bumming free breakfasts while travelling third class on Spanish trains?

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you think Corbyn has lost the plot, check out

> his brother, completely unhinged...

>

>


> 370692608

>

> #toomanyhashtags



LOL "Paul the Centrist Dad" top in the replies as always - he's not really centrist (but for some reason he still follows me after I said I hoped he enjoyed his holiday).

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > And like many of the Pro Brexit brigade he?s

> full

> > of guff

> >

> > If you can be bothered go and read his ?for

> sale?

> > posts of old. They make Nicholas Parsons sound

> > like a ?man of few words?.

>

> Ah Seabag, what a pleasure.

>

> Still bumming free breakfasts while travelling

> third class on Spanish trains?



And that alone shows the generous spirit of the Spanish.


Mind you, had it been a French train, I?d have most likely starved 😳.


Is there 3rd class, really? Or is this one of those Boris and straight bananas type throw away comments.


Dunno!

The headline in the Express today is very provocative again. "Ignore the will of the people at your peril". Being owned by Trinity Mirror (now Reach) I thought they might be more responsible.


*** Resignation Alert ***


Phillip Lee resigns as Justice Minister


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2018/jun/12/brexit-no-10-rejects-last-minute-meaningful-vote-compromise-ahead-of-key-vote-politics-live

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The headline in the Express today is very

> provocative again. "Ignore the will of the people

> at your peril". Being owned by Trinity Mirror

> (now Reach) I thought they might be more

> responsible.


The Sun's front page is a hotch potch of badly Photoshopped 'British icons'...


Windsor Castle...built by a Norman duke;

The Mini...designed by a Greek;

The Shard...designed by an Italian;

And not forgetting The Sun itself...owned by an Australian now an American resident.

The best one is the Loch Ness Monster...fictional, just like Brexit :)

I know its loltastic and shizzle, but underestimate the stubborn fury of out of London leave voters* at your peril - this isn't going to go away and many would like to see it enacted irrespective of cost and impact. London is the mega city one to their cursed earth - there is nothing they would like more than to teach it a lesson. things are arguably grimmer up north than they have been since the last century.


Whilst we fret about our avocado smash supplies and finding a new aupair, many, many decent people who have no faith in the gerrymandered political system any longer are up against it on a daily basis & our catcalls of ignorant racist and bigot are hardly likely to build any support in the short term.


the EDF can be a bit of a echo chamber sometimes.


* and I didn't use the gammon word either, as it pretty offensive apparently. rofl.

flocker spotter Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Whilst we fret about our avocado smash supplies

> and finding a new aupair...

>


Not what I'm fretting about. I'm a disabled person on a small pension. Brexit will mean further erosion of the NHS and social care.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...