Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Carole Cadwalladr has reported that the Tax Payers alliance has agreed to accept all guilt in the dismissal and character attacks on Shahmir Sanni


https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/nov/11/brexit-whistleblower-shahmir-sanni-taxpayers-alliance-concedes-it-launched-smears?CMP=share_btn_tw


Apparently by conceding that they won't be forced to reveal their benefactors in court.

JJ is having a pop today - sounds like the vote is lost - maybe she won't even get it through cabinet.


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/theresa-may-accused-of-calculated-deceit-of-the-british-public-over-brexit-a3987516.html


but most chilling for me in that case


?frankly, there haven?t been enough no-deal preparations to prove an alternative?.

The PM - either deluded or lying I'm afraid. Even 52-48 is not overwhelming and I subscribe to the belief that has changed.



'She said Britons "overwhelmingly" wanted her to "get on" with leaving the EU at the address on Monday night.'


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/theresa-may-i-wont-at-any-cost-sign-a-brexit-deal-that-compromises-referendum-result-a3988186.html


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-eu-final-say-remain-leave-new-poll-latest-news-uk-a8524431.html

Statements like that don't really bother me at this stage, as there is an argument that to say something like ''there will be a 2nd ref'' would undermine their already tenuous negotiating position. At the moment it all feels like grandstanding at the eleventh hour, who will blink first. The consensus seems that whatever we end up with will get voted down and we'll end up in a full blown constitutional crisis with the clock still ticking. One under-reported event from last week is that the Gov lost an appeal against a case for the CJEU to rule whether the UK can unilaterally withdraw the A50 notice, thereby not needing the approval of all the EU27, as it currently stands. You'd think that would be a nice insurance to have should things get really sticky, but this Gov is trying to appeal again, this time to the Supreme Court, using 5 QC's, more than they used in the Gina Miller case. If it fails the case will be heard before the CJEU at the end of this month. This was one of the reasons why the Gov has been rushing to get a deal done for a Nov summit before then, but that doesn't look like it will happen now. Instead, it will be mid-Dec, which is good news and weakens the Gov's line that the only options are a bad deal or no deal.

It also looks like the Gov will have to publish their Brexit legal advice. For a Gov that proposes Gov ''taking back control'', they have a funny way of showing it...

Jacob Rees Mogg has said Theresa Mays deal is not just a vassal state but a slave state. The video (posted by Faisal Islam) is all foggy like some strange found footage movie.


By the way Faisal is moving from Sky to the BBC as Economics Editor


https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2018/faisal-islam

Robert Mueller is after Nigel Farage and Arron Banks apparently. I'd love it if Farage was the brains behind all the sh*t going on in the world - but can't see it.


https://www.newsweek.com/mueller-wants-info-donald-trumps-british-ally-far-right-politician-nigel-1214039


Lovely pic mind.

I find all of this confusing. Is May actually working pro-EU and the Border/ Backstop is actually a distraction? There is so little fact - and not enough detail about it to warrant all the big headlines about it.


It would appear that we are leaving but nothing is changing? apart from a divorce settlement.


Do we actually know?

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I find all of this confusing. Is May actually

> working pro-EU and the Border/ Backstop is

> actually a distraction? There is so little fact -

> and not enough detail about it to warrant all the

> big headlines about it.

>

> It would appear that we are leaving but nothing is

> changing? apart from a divorce settlement.

>

> Do we actually know?


We haven't seen her plan but it's leaking out.


We won't have representation on the Council of Ministers, We won't have MEPs (as in any form of Brexit) but we have to follow all the rules and maintain all the standards of a member. We won't be negotiating our own trade deals until we can exit the temporary deal which apparently is almost impossible to do (according to leaks)


So (in my view which is similar to the Brexiteers) there is something of the Vassal state in her plan.

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so, actually worse than before. no control and no

> input.

>

> are we really expecting the cabinet to pass this?

> surely it's just impossibly blind.


Remainers and Leavers seem united in not liking this deal.


I bet Theresa May has something up her sleeve - she may be really bad at some things but she's always been good at finding ways of getting things through parliament using every trick in the book.

Angelina Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> well that's worrying - whether she's got a way of

> wiggling this through, or if there's more to it

> that we don't know about.....???

>

> there's a protest today if anyone's near.


A protest? A sort of 'down with this type of thing' type protest? It's probably hard to be specific.

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Something to lighten the mood, BBC Director and

> anti-Brexit protester go head to head :)...

> https://twitter.com/SimonNRicketts/status/10626846

> 49749708800



LOL Sodem - One day they'll have tech to delete him from shot in real time (and that'll be a bad day)

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I bet Theresa May has something up her sleeve -

> she may be really bad at some things but she's

> always been good at finding ways of getting things

> through parliament using every trick in the book.


I reckon she'll use the ticking clock a lot, already has form for that, and is even doing it with her own Cabinet today. Having first seen the WA late last night, a document which by all accounts is 500 pages long, and very, very, detailed, they are expected to give a verdict on it this afternoon. Last December they couldn't even decipher a couple of A4s, which brought about the problematic issue of the Irish backstop. Expect it will go through with little fuss, then it will be interesting to see how May sells it to her party (and some Labour MPs in Leave seats). The obvious line will be the threat of No Deal, but that doesn't cut it with the ERG and DUP, or even Labour rebels like Hoey, who being Brexit ideologues would actually prefer that...

What's the betting that if the Govt No deals on Brexit, the cost of the weekly shop will rocket in price as soon as it is announced or possibly from 1st April next year?


Has anyone bought additional non perishable items as a precaution (especially those that are imported into the UK from the continent/EU?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...