Jump to content

Recommended Posts

well, not really true. We had a referendum (not a frequent thing) and then we're doing what the referendum vote decided on, although it's proving tricky as EU think a proposal amounts to a done-deal and this proposal was rejected as not in our best interests.


True that a number of people think that it doesn't count or that we can have another one until there is a different result (best out of three?) but that doesn't really matter. There is always lots of 'noise'.

"well, not really true"


sorry but it's exactly true - and all you have to do is look at other countries with more practice in referendums


It's tricky to implement the referendum result because it's impossible to do - that leave vote contains at least 3 groups of mutually antagonistic types of leaver. They will never agree on what they want or will compromise on


All brexits lead to a worse off country


to say it's because of the EU is... well.. bluster and arrogance at best. Ignorance is involved too. Sorry - but it is

Why does that put me on dodgy ground? It's exactly the point I'm making


A country took a poll, reviewed the changes and outcome and took a second poll


democracy didn't fall

people didn't riot

Support for EU remained high


that's a mature process - the opposite of this country

I see a stitch up coming whilst the papers talk about Tusk. May must be coming under pressure.


"Speaking after a meeting with the prime minister in Brussels, Brexit coordinator Guy Verhofstadt said ?we welcome? the letter the Labour leader had sent to the prime minister laying out his party?s alternative proposals.


?We have reiterated that we cannot have an agreement with uncertainty in the UK based on majorities of six, seven, eight, nine votes in the House of Commons,?"


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-jeremy-corbyn-verhofstadt-labour-european-parliament-theresa-may-backstop-a8767931.html

"I?m not struggling at all. It?s fantasy* to think the people reviewed their decision spontaneously.


The facts were your political masters in Ireland and Europe made you vote again because the people gave what they considered the wrong answers. "


This is what I mean by delusional - this is pure tin foil nonsense


If "our political masters in Ireland and Europe made you vote again" then why would the second vote reverse teh first by such a large margin - seriously, why?


And if it was fixed somehow, why weren't people protesting?


And why has support for EU membership remained so high?


You simply don't have any answers - because you live in a made up world

Will be dismissed as EU propaganda I know but "Asking the public twice: why do voters change their minds in second referendums on EU treaties?" by Ece ?zlem Atikcan LSE


http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/10/19/asking-the-public-twice-why-do-voters-change-their-minds-in-second-referendums-on-eu-treaties/


actually more of a why than whether they should - but implies there's a democracy to multiple votes in complex matters to me :)

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The facts were your political masters in Ireland

> and Europe made you vote again because the people

> gave what they considered the wrong answers.


I think you'll find that they realised they asked the wrong question, hence the wrong answer. Once they got the question right, so they got the right answer...:)

Hey, you?re the one who plays fantasy games not me.


Without giving you a history lesson and going into too much detail, your political masters won some legal guarantees from the EU and re-framed the second referendum debates. Project fear also played a part in the Lisbon referendum mark II at least where Yes slogans such as ?Europe: Let?s be at the heart of it? were replaced with more dramatic messages such as ?Ruin versus recovery?.

Unfortunately Sephiroth, unlike Ireland which won firm legal guarantees from the EU which satisfied the reservations of the voters, I can?t see the EU giving us firm legal guarantees that Prevent us being trapped by the backstop. As such any second referendum now would only be a re-run of the first.


It was a mistake not to discuss a trade deal in parallel with the withdrawal agreement as a trade deal favourable to both parties might negate the need for a backstop. But we are where we are.


The EU?s insistence on the backstop implies a favourable trade deal is unlikely.

"The EU?s insistence on the backstop "


It was Britain which insisted on the backstop - and the EU budged to allow it in Dec 2017. But of COURSE people like you have to keep blaming others - you just can't admit it was a bad, bad mistake


Plenty of people have released their mistake* - but of course people like you would deny them the agency to express that.


* How many? Enough to change the vote? If only there was a way to measure it

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The EU?s insistence on the backstop "

>

> It was Britain which insisted on the backstop -

> and the EU budged to allow it in Dec 2017. But of

> COURSE people like you have to keep blaming others

> - you just can't admit it was a bad, bad mistake

>

> Plenty of people have released their mistake* -

> but of course people like you would deny them the

> agency to express that.

>

> * How many? Enough to change the vote? If only

> there was a way to measure it


We have 2.5 years of youngsters coming to voting age since June 2016 mainly supporting remain. This has already been proven to surpass the 2016 lead.

"We have 2.5 years of youngsters coming to voting age since June 2016 mainly supporting remain. This has already been proven to surpass the 2016 lead."


I'm not sure how much faith we could put in that number alone - but again without another poll we can never know


It's entirely Britain's fault that a second ref would essentially be a rerun of the first one - it never had any cards to play in the first place, has been outclassed every step of the way and was always going to be


If it does go ahead with leaving, then it will continue to be outclassed in future trade deals with other large nations - but again, it simply can't admit it

I think you?re right, it was our negotiating team that came up with the backstop as a possible solution to the border issue.


I would be prepared to accept the backstop if there was a short time limit on it. As it stands there is little incentive for the EU to negotiate an all encompassing trade deal

"I would be prepared to accept the backstop if there was a short time limit on it"


Then it isn't a backstop is it?


Try getting a 25 year mortgage with a time limit on the obligation to pay back


But inventing ever more elaborate wangles to try and squeeze smallest possible concessions is all so pointless - it's all risk and little reward

The EU have said they'll help May on the backstop if she removes some red lines - but at present that seems to be the Customs Union.


ALl this horsetrading will have an effect on Westminster and I'm still tempted to say rip up the book and lets start from scratch whatever happens with Brexit. Our system hasn't been good enough for this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They clearly don’t.  I would expect better from the council.  Rather dismally, it sounds like any complaints or requests just fall on deaf ears.
    • No, because they are a business and their job is to make a profit. It is the local council, on our behalf, who should be giving regard to the environment. Gala, not unreasonably, might take the view that it is the council's role to protect the environment of Southwark, and if they have no objection to this scheme then frankly why shouldn't they (Gala) go ahead? And the council also seems to take the view that they are focused on revenue and not the environment. Otherwise they might listen to the environmental pleas here. The mistake you are making is assuming that either party to this transaction (we are clearly only bystanders) gives a flying fig for the environment when there is money in the offing.
    • It struck me last year that any dialogue with Gala themselves e.g. at the box-ticking "Community Engagement Sessions" is completely pointless, as they are just a business trying to do whatever is necessary to hold their event; the park is just a venue to them, a necessary facility, and they'll say anything to secure it. They don't care about it's welfare or upkeep, over and above making sure there's no complaints big enough to prevent them using it again. I've found that discussing issues with them has just led to them using that info to counteract that issue - effectively helping them strengthen their position. What I find frustrating is that the council, despite being the body that decides on this, and should be representing local residents, takes no active part in any discussions or presentations, so there's no way to engage with them apart from an online consultation which is clearly also a box ticking exercise, bearing in mind for the last two years the overwhelming majority (97% of respondents) objected to the event. Why are Gala running the community meetings? Why do Gala run the issue hotline? If the council really care about the park and the surrounding community, and still allow this type of event, they should be way more hands on with taking responsibility for it's running, not just handing it all over to a profit making company.  Sorry, probably tldr but so sad about the repeated negative impact on our (once beautiful & peaceful) park and just exasperated that there's so little that can be done to halt it. This is just the start, it WILL turn into another Brockwell Park, and Gala & the council just don't care.
    • We used these guys for our underfloor heating, their heating engineer Sam was excellent. Very reassuring and sorted it all out properly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...