Jump to content

Recommended Posts

well, not really true. We had a referendum (not a frequent thing) and then we're doing what the referendum vote decided on, although it's proving tricky as EU think a proposal amounts to a done-deal and this proposal was rejected as not in our best interests.


True that a number of people think that it doesn't count or that we can have another one until there is a different result (best out of three?) but that doesn't really matter. There is always lots of 'noise'.

"well, not really true"


sorry but it's exactly true - and all you have to do is look at other countries with more practice in referendums


It's tricky to implement the referendum result because it's impossible to do - that leave vote contains at least 3 groups of mutually antagonistic types of leaver. They will never agree on what they want or will compromise on


All brexits lead to a worse off country


to say it's because of the EU is... well.. bluster and arrogance at best. Ignorance is involved too. Sorry - but it is

Why does that put me on dodgy ground? It's exactly the point I'm making


A country took a poll, reviewed the changes and outcome and took a second poll


democracy didn't fall

people didn't riot

Support for EU remained high


that's a mature process - the opposite of this country

I see a stitch up coming whilst the papers talk about Tusk. May must be coming under pressure.


"Speaking after a meeting with the prime minister in Brussels, Brexit coordinator Guy Verhofstadt said ?we welcome? the letter the Labour leader had sent to the prime minister laying out his party?s alternative proposals.


?We have reiterated that we cannot have an agreement with uncertainty in the UK based on majorities of six, seven, eight, nine votes in the House of Commons,?"


https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-jeremy-corbyn-verhofstadt-labour-european-parliament-theresa-may-backstop-a8767931.html

"I?m not struggling at all. It?s fantasy* to think the people reviewed their decision spontaneously.


The facts were your political masters in Ireland and Europe made you vote again because the people gave what they considered the wrong answers. "


This is what I mean by delusional - this is pure tin foil nonsense


If "our political masters in Ireland and Europe made you vote again" then why would the second vote reverse teh first by such a large margin - seriously, why?


And if it was fixed somehow, why weren't people protesting?


And why has support for EU membership remained so high?


You simply don't have any answers - because you live in a made up world

Will be dismissed as EU propaganda I know but "Asking the public twice: why do voters change their minds in second referendums on EU treaties?" by Ece ?zlem Atikcan LSE


http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2015/10/19/asking-the-public-twice-why-do-voters-change-their-minds-in-second-referendums-on-eu-treaties/


actually more of a why than whether they should - but implies there's a democracy to multiple votes in complex matters to me :)

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The facts were your political masters in Ireland

> and Europe made you vote again because the people

> gave what they considered the wrong answers.


I think you'll find that they realised they asked the wrong question, hence the wrong answer. Once they got the question right, so they got the right answer...:)

Hey, you?re the one who plays fantasy games not me.


Without giving you a history lesson and going into too much detail, your political masters won some legal guarantees from the EU and re-framed the second referendum debates. Project fear also played a part in the Lisbon referendum mark II at least where Yes slogans such as ?Europe: Let?s be at the heart of it? were replaced with more dramatic messages such as ?Ruin versus recovery?.

Unfortunately Sephiroth, unlike Ireland which won firm legal guarantees from the EU which satisfied the reservations of the voters, I can?t see the EU giving us firm legal guarantees that Prevent us being trapped by the backstop. As such any second referendum now would only be a re-run of the first.


It was a mistake not to discuss a trade deal in parallel with the withdrawal agreement as a trade deal favourable to both parties might negate the need for a backstop. But we are where we are.


The EU?s insistence on the backstop implies a favourable trade deal is unlikely.

"The EU?s insistence on the backstop "


It was Britain which insisted on the backstop - and the EU budged to allow it in Dec 2017. But of COURSE people like you have to keep blaming others - you just can't admit it was a bad, bad mistake


Plenty of people have released their mistake* - but of course people like you would deny them the agency to express that.


* How many? Enough to change the vote? If only there was a way to measure it

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "The EU?s insistence on the backstop "

>

> It was Britain which insisted on the backstop -

> and the EU budged to allow it in Dec 2017. But of

> COURSE people like you have to keep blaming others

> - you just can't admit it was a bad, bad mistake

>

> Plenty of people have released their mistake* -

> but of course people like you would deny them the

> agency to express that.

>

> * How many? Enough to change the vote? If only

> there was a way to measure it


We have 2.5 years of youngsters coming to voting age since June 2016 mainly supporting remain. This has already been proven to surpass the 2016 lead.

"We have 2.5 years of youngsters coming to voting age since June 2016 mainly supporting remain. This has already been proven to surpass the 2016 lead."


I'm not sure how much faith we could put in that number alone - but again without another poll we can never know


It's entirely Britain's fault that a second ref would essentially be a rerun of the first one - it never had any cards to play in the first place, has been outclassed every step of the way and was always going to be


If it does go ahead with leaving, then it will continue to be outclassed in future trade deals with other large nations - but again, it simply can't admit it

I think you?re right, it was our negotiating team that came up with the backstop as a possible solution to the border issue.


I would be prepared to accept the backstop if there was a short time limit on it. As it stands there is little incentive for the EU to negotiate an all encompassing trade deal

"I would be prepared to accept the backstop if there was a short time limit on it"


Then it isn't a backstop is it?


Try getting a 25 year mortgage with a time limit on the obligation to pay back


But inventing ever more elaborate wangles to try and squeeze smallest possible concessions is all so pointless - it's all risk and little reward

The EU have said they'll help May on the backstop if she removes some red lines - but at present that seems to be the Customs Union.


ALl this horsetrading will have an effect on Westminster and I'm still tempted to say rip up the book and lets start from scratch whatever happens with Brexit. Our system hasn't been good enough for this.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...