Jump to content

Recommended Posts

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

>

> I do have a problem with medicines being

> delayed because of form filling. It would be

> unnecessary as we have been importing these

> medicines from the same reputable sources for the

> last 40-odd years.

>

> I don?t believe the EU would allow such a

> situation.


But that wouldn?t respect the referendum, where people voted against free movement of goods


It?d be an insult to democracy surely?

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Whilst on the subject of medicine, we should

> remember that the European regulatory HQ recently

> left London taking hundreds of jobs with it, as a

> direct result of brexit

>

> And leaving the uk without effective law

> regulating medicine here (unless we just stick

> with the eu regime, which presumably isn?t what

> leavers want)

>

> This is our problem not theirs


The EMA is the body you refer to and it was only founded in 1995- what on earth did we do before then?(rhetorical question riddled with sarcasm- obviously)

We have QC and QA companies operating in the UK and they are strictly controlled by the FDA as well as European monitoring- although from what I can find out the EMA did not really do anything important!

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> pk Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> We have QC and QA companies operating in the UK

> and they are strictly controlled by the FDA as

> well as European monitoring


But we?ve voted against European ?monitoring? surely, so that won?t do


Isn?t this all about not liking their rules and not wanting to comply with them and a desire to set own great British rules that are the best and that don?t allow free movement of goods

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I concede I do over-simplify things. However there

> is a tendency to tie ourselves up in knots with

> all the rules - directive xyz as amended blah

> blah. The danger is we can?t see the woods for the

> trees.

>

> I think it?s Parkinson?s law that basically says

> bureaucrats make up rules to keep themselves in

> jobs.

>

> I don?t have a problem with the avocado for my

> morning toast going up in price because of a

> tariff. I do have a problem with medicines being

> delayed because of form filling. It would be

> unnecessary as we have been importing these

> medicines from the same reputable sources for the

> last 40-odd years.

>

> I don?t believe the EU would allow such a

> situation.


Oh they would. You said so yourself. They are blackmailing the UK aren't they?

Let?s see what The founder of the Brexit part is saying shall we?


?Clapham looks like the Carribean


Tower Hamlets looks like Pakistan or Syria


Mornington Crescent looks like Turkey


Redbridge looks like a foreign country .


And

Bermondsey and Stratford just look like one big non English mess.?


Looks like racism to me

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Plenty of Irish callers ringing O'Brien on LBC

> today

>

> noticeable change in quality of thinking compared

> to the regular Leave callers


The man is an absolute unashamed liar. And he no longer conducts a phone in show- he monopolises almost the entire proceedings- I think they only let people through who agree with his rhetoric- he is belligerent, speaks through clenched teeth and is an out and out LIAR ( I haven't listened to him for months since I got sick of complaining to LBC about his lies- so he may be different now...I doubt it though- his type NEVER change)

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sephiroth Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Plenty of Irish callers ringing O'Brien on LBC

> > today

> >

> > noticeable change in quality of thinking

> compared

> > to the regular Leave callers

>

> The man is an absolute unashamed liar. And he no

> longer conducts a phone in show- he monopolises

> almost the entire proceedings- I think they only

> let people through who agree with his rhetoric- he

> is belligerent, speaks through clenched teeth and

> is an out and out LIAR ( I haven't listened to him

> for months since I got sick of complaining to LBC

> about his lies- so he may be different now...I

> doubt it though- his type NEVER change)



And you are a unashamed fool.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The man is an absolute unashamed liar. And he no

> longer conducts a phone in show- he monopolises

> almost the entire proceedings- I think they only

> let people through who agree with his rhetoric- he

> is belligerent, speaks through clenched teeth and

> is an out and out LIAR ( I haven't listened to him

> for months since I got sick of complaining to LBC

> about his lies- so he may be different now...I

> doubt it though- his type NEVER change)


This is about Boris surely?

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you watch Boris get given the coffee and then

> having it taken away from him (it was a one use

> coffee cup) again you realise the man is just a

> pawn in the hands of his advisors. Thick of It

> stuff :)

>

> He just waved his arms about.


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Which is exactly why Rayner had to go - don't be the sleaze attack dog and then not keep your own house in order - the really shocking fact is she didn't go the moment this came to light because she knew what advice, and the advice to seek proper tax expertise that was given to her in writing by the very people she was trying to throw under the bus - she clearly thought she might be able to spin her way out of it. When you look at the facts, the advice she was given and when and her behaviour in the last few days it has been scandalous and just shows the contempt for the public intelligence some politicians have. Interesting to see a very unscientific vox pop on BBC News last night but a lot of her own constituents seem to want rid of her as well and to be honest if you have to lose your cabinet role for this breach of the rules then you should probably lose your seat too. That is the hypocrisy here and why a lot of people don't like politicians because they're all the same.
    • Hi all, I’m after a stereo amp in working condition. Not necessarily anything fancy, as long as it works. Thanks
    • You are missing my point, there are a few here who are rabidly anti Labour.  And have lost sight of the many scandals associated with their party.  I've not made excuses for Rayner, rather I am inferring that it is hypocritical to go on about one of the major parties whilst ignoring your own dirty washing.   You are not making sense.  I expect half the country likes a drink and a sizeable number likes a vape.  What is your point?
    • If you read the article posted above, it is all very carefully worded. However I've found this: https://uknip.co.uk/news/uk/uk-news/peckham-rye-park-attack-man-seriously-injured-august-2025/  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...