Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose" of the act is as you say, nothing you raised impacts his ability to comply with the law.?


What if Boris wrote the letter and attached it to a carrier pigeon that regrettably didn?t make it out of England due to confusion during a pheasant shoot?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose"

> of the act is as you say, nothing you raised

> impacts his ability to comply with the law.?

>

> What if Boris wrote the letter and attached it to

> a carrier pigeon that regrettably didn?t make it

> out of England due to confusion during a pheasant

> shoot?


What?s the point of writing this rubbish?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are worried about rubbish?

>

> Tell me one thing that has been achieved since the

> Remainers won the Supreme Court case and

> Parliament was re-convened.

>

> One thing please pk


parliament has had a (limited) opportunity to ask questions on brexit planning and yellowhammer and the country had an opportunity to hear the same


tell me one thing that makes talk about pigeons anything other than rubbish

?parliament has had a (limited) opportunity to ask questions on brexit planning and yellowhammer and the country had an opportunity to hear the same?


Wow!


?tell me one thing that makes talk about pigeons anything other than rubbish?


Treat it as an allegory pk - a device to simplify a broader matter. Stepdown is concerned that Boris must obey the law. What does the Act say about non-delivery? Perhaps you can advise

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are worried about rubbish?

>

> Tell me one thing that has been achieved since the

> Remainers won the Supreme Court case and

> Parliament was re-convened.

>

> One thing please pk


Sovereignty of Parliament over an Executive that tried to shut it down and silence scrutiny, i.e one of the constitutional pillars of our democracy. As achievements go that's quite a biggie.

As for parliamentary specifics, a number of Acts that otherwise would've been lost had prorogation not been annulled, one being on domestic violence...

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does it explain how Boris will obey the law but

> not ask for an extension?


Suggest you read this, it's why Johnson/Cummings are now shitting themselves...

https://davidallengreen.com/2019/10/the-128-chilling-words-in-the-scottish-case/

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does it explain how Boris will obey the law but

> > not ask for an extension?

>

> Suggest you read this, it's why Johnson/Cummings

> are now shitting themselves...

> https://davidallengreen.com/2019/10/the-128-chilli

> ng-words-in-the-scottish-case/


I don?t click on links. Is he a remainer?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If keano and glen haven?t figured out they are

> rubes on the wrong side of history by now, it?s

> unlikely they ever will

>

> (Confession: I briefly held out on the idea that

> keano might actually be open to evidence. I was

> wrong. So wrong)


There is no evidence we haven?t left. Plenty of guesswork about what might or might not happen from the people who didn?t see the financial crash staring them in the face.

Honestly Sephiroth and pk I?ve no idea what will happen.


The current thinking seems to be the EU will give us an extension until next summer to allow a confirmatory referendum to take place which is being planned by Remainers who might introduce a bill for this as early as next week.


Unless of course Boris has a dastardly plan

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I don?t click on links. Is he a remainer?


No, he's actually a long-term Eurosceptic dating back to Maastricht. He's a legal commentator and primarily comments from the perspective of law and policy...and watching panda videos (in-joke)

So whats going to be in the Queens speech next week and should it be voted down ?.


Just wondering if a pledge is made in the Queens speech to ask for an extension or alternatively NOT to ask for an extension what should remainers hope for and if the Queens speech is voted down is that automatically an election ?.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • How on earth can someone like this be allowed to continue as a solicitor? Can't he just be struck off, or the equivalent?
    • There are no road works in front of Cod fellas and yesterday when I requested a stop there the driver went straight past and never stopped untill Avondale Riss. As cars have to stop because of the lights why can busses not do this? 1 minute Bloodly mindedness.
    • These are the smokeless fuels you can burn on a open fireplace in Southwark: https://smokecontrol.defra.gov.uk/fuels-php/england/ https://www.southwark.gov.uk/planning-environment-and-building-control/environment/air-quality/reduce-air-pollution/reduce-smoke
    • Thanks all, our hope was (despite the diminishing estate) he would get on with it.  Progress is glacial, it's been two years since probate was granted, that's two cold and damp winters with no heating, and not surprisingly a pipe burst. He's blames the issues on the estate agent, who separately had a dispute with him, he had a wobbly when one of the beneficiaries spoke to the estate agent.  Separately he said it was the family's fault for letting the property get into a poor condition.  It was dated, but certainly not in poor condition. There are two five star reviews on Google, and five one star: ** WARNING** This solicitor firm has to be one of the worst I have encountered. The solicitor is prehistoric in his practices and will carry out work at his own snails pace, the fax machine he uses gets turned off at 2 pm and its near impossible to get him on the phone. STAY AWAY, YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, check the solicitors ombudsman, this firm has previous bad practice recorded.   Disgusting under no circumstances use this solicitor.For over 10 years he has not carried out the terms of a Will he has not re-invested money but has retained it.  He writes letters which are pure "Flannel" excuses for doing nothing.  You have been warned   shocking experience, delayed the whole process, told other side solicitors to not contact him as he feels pressured etc. never use.   Not fit for 21st century. No website, no email address, no electronic transfer. Very slow, very little communication.   Was not a pleasant experience dealing with this firm    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...