Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose" of the act is as you say, nothing you raised impacts his ability to comply with the law.?


What if Boris wrote the letter and attached it to a carrier pigeon that regrettably didn?t make it out of England due to confusion during a pheasant shoot?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose"

> of the act is as you say, nothing you raised

> impacts his ability to comply with the law.?

>

> What if Boris wrote the letter and attached it to

> a carrier pigeon that regrettably didn?t make it

> out of England due to confusion during a pheasant

> shoot?


What?s the point of writing this rubbish?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are worried about rubbish?

>

> Tell me one thing that has been achieved since the

> Remainers won the Supreme Court case and

> Parliament was re-convened.

>

> One thing please pk


parliament has had a (limited) opportunity to ask questions on brexit planning and yellowhammer and the country had an opportunity to hear the same


tell me one thing that makes talk about pigeons anything other than rubbish

?parliament has had a (limited) opportunity to ask questions on brexit planning and yellowhammer and the country had an opportunity to hear the same?


Wow!


?tell me one thing that makes talk about pigeons anything other than rubbish?


Treat it as an allegory pk - a device to simplify a broader matter. Stepdown is concerned that Boris must obey the law. What does the Act say about non-delivery? Perhaps you can advise

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are worried about rubbish?

>

> Tell me one thing that has been achieved since the

> Remainers won the Supreme Court case and

> Parliament was re-convened.

>

> One thing please pk


Sovereignty of Parliament over an Executive that tried to shut it down and silence scrutiny, i.e one of the constitutional pillars of our democracy. As achievements go that's quite a biggie.

As for parliamentary specifics, a number of Acts that otherwise would've been lost had prorogation not been annulled, one being on domestic violence...

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does it explain how Boris will obey the law but

> not ask for an extension?


Suggest you read this, it's why Johnson/Cummings are now shitting themselves...

https://davidallengreen.com/2019/10/the-128-chilling-words-in-the-scottish-case/

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does it explain how Boris will obey the law but

> > not ask for an extension?

>

> Suggest you read this, it's why Johnson/Cummings

> are now shitting themselves...

> https://davidallengreen.com/2019/10/the-128-chilli

> ng-words-in-the-scottish-case/


I don?t click on links. Is he a remainer?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If keano and glen haven?t figured out they are

> rubes on the wrong side of history by now, it?s

> unlikely they ever will

>

> (Confession: I briefly held out on the idea that

> keano might actually be open to evidence. I was

> wrong. So wrong)


There is no evidence we haven?t left. Plenty of guesswork about what might or might not happen from the people who didn?t see the financial crash staring them in the face.

Honestly Sephiroth and pk I?ve no idea what will happen.


The current thinking seems to be the EU will give us an extension until next summer to allow a confirmatory referendum to take place which is being planned by Remainers who might introduce a bill for this as early as next week.


Unless of course Boris has a dastardly plan

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I don?t click on links. Is he a remainer?


No, he's actually a long-term Eurosceptic dating back to Maastricht. He's a legal commentator and primarily comments from the perspective of law and policy...and watching panda videos (in-joke)

So whats going to be in the Queens speech next week and should it be voted down ?.


Just wondering if a pledge is made in the Queens speech to ask for an extension or alternatively NOT to ask for an extension what should remainers hope for and if the Queens speech is voted down is that automatically an election ?.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
    • Hello! I'm looking for a talented, affordable people photographer to do headshots for my start up's website, for 4 people. If you're keen I'd love to see examples of your work please. Many thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...