Jump to content

Recommended Posts

?Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose" of the act is as you say, nothing you raised impacts his ability to comply with the law.?


What if Boris wrote the letter and attached it to a carrier pigeon that regrettably didn?t make it out of England due to confusion during a pheasant shoot?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ?Only, it isn't. Even if we accept "the purpose"

> of the act is as you say, nothing you raised

> impacts his ability to comply with the law.?

>

> What if Boris wrote the letter and attached it to

> a carrier pigeon that regrettably didn?t make it

> out of England due to confusion during a pheasant

> shoot?


What?s the point of writing this rubbish?

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are worried about rubbish?

>

> Tell me one thing that has been achieved since the

> Remainers won the Supreme Court case and

> Parliament was re-convened.

>

> One thing please pk


parliament has had a (limited) opportunity to ask questions on brexit planning and yellowhammer and the country had an opportunity to hear the same


tell me one thing that makes talk about pigeons anything other than rubbish

?parliament has had a (limited) opportunity to ask questions on brexit planning and yellowhammer and the country had an opportunity to hear the same?


Wow!


?tell me one thing that makes talk about pigeons anything other than rubbish?


Treat it as an allegory pk - a device to simplify a broader matter. Stepdown is concerned that Boris must obey the law. What does the Act say about non-delivery? Perhaps you can advise

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You are worried about rubbish?

>

> Tell me one thing that has been achieved since the

> Remainers won the Supreme Court case and

> Parliament was re-convened.

>

> One thing please pk


Sovereignty of Parliament over an Executive that tried to shut it down and silence scrutiny, i.e one of the constitutional pillars of our democracy. As achievements go that's quite a biggie.

As for parliamentary specifics, a number of Acts that otherwise would've been lost had prorogation not been annulled, one being on domestic violence...

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Does it explain how Boris will obey the law but

> not ask for an extension?


Suggest you read this, it's why Johnson/Cummings are now shitting themselves...

https://davidallengreen.com/2019/10/the-128-chilling-words-in-the-scottish-case/

diable rouge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> keano77 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Does it explain how Boris will obey the law but

> > not ask for an extension?

>

> Suggest you read this, it's why Johnson/Cummings

> are now shitting themselves...

> https://davidallengreen.com/2019/10/the-128-chilli

> ng-words-in-the-scottish-case/


I don?t click on links. Is he a remainer?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If keano and glen haven?t figured out they are

> rubes on the wrong side of history by now, it?s

> unlikely they ever will

>

> (Confession: I briefly held out on the idea that

> keano might actually be open to evidence. I was

> wrong. So wrong)


There is no evidence we haven?t left. Plenty of guesswork about what might or might not happen from the people who didn?t see the financial crash staring them in the face.

Honestly Sephiroth and pk I?ve no idea what will happen.


The current thinking seems to be the EU will give us an extension until next summer to allow a confirmatory referendum to take place which is being planned by Remainers who might introduce a bill for this as early as next week.


Unless of course Boris has a dastardly plan

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I don?t click on links. Is he a remainer?


No, he's actually a long-term Eurosceptic dating back to Maastricht. He's a legal commentator and primarily comments from the perspective of law and policy...and watching panda videos (in-joke)

So whats going to be in the Queens speech next week and should it be voted down ?.


Just wondering if a pledge is made in the Queens speech to ask for an extension or alternatively NOT to ask for an extension what should remainers hope for and if the Queens speech is voted down is that automatically an election ?.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...