Jump to content

Recommended Posts

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can the 52% tell me what they voted for


They didn?t vote for anything, they voted against something which is why it?s impossible to deliver


So totally agree, need to ask the people whether they want this deal or not

There have been some strange bedfellows during the Brexit process but this takes some beating, Farage snuggling under the duvet with Hilary Benn... :)


So an unelected, retiring bureaucrat says: No extension, take this new treaty or just leave.


He is overriding the Benn Act. The EU shows itself to be a thuggocracy - power without accountability.


Appalling people.

just on it's own terms, not looking at other effects, a zero tarrif deal would only be about tarrifs. It would have little impact on rules of origins and would require significant red-tape and extra paperwork.


SO like much of brexit, it requires a LOT of extra effort, the goodwill of other nations and risk of splitting up the union to achieve very little at all


If the deal struck yesterday was the one advertised on buses 3 years ago would it have won? Not even close

It won't change my view of it at all. Brexit is still a very bad idea that will leave the country poorer, more bitter and divided. It also takes away established reciprocal rights such as FoM. As Brexiters like to point out, it's not only about the economy and free-trade deals. It's about the kind of country the UK is going to be in the future. I don't like that future promised by Brexit at all.


TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Genuine question to remainers, posed in good

> faith, so appreciate any responses in the same

> spirit.

>

> If the UK and the EU struck a zero tariff, zero

> quota free-trade deal....how might that change

> your view of brexit?

Sephiroth Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I see Raab is rolling out lines about it being "a

> cracking deal for Northern Ireland because it will

> keep friction-less access to the single market"

>

> But if that is A Good Thing.. etc etc


gung ho Brits don't need single market access I guess

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the UK and the EU struck a zero tariff, zero

> quota free-trade deal....how might that change

> your view of brexit?


It's difficult to answer when the deal you've set out is so vague, it focuses only on one aspect and glosses over all the detail that has hamstrung the process so far. I would be comfortable with a Norway style deal as an example, but the Overton window has shifted so far that is now seen as Brexit in name only by many.


That said, as "a remainer" I voted to maintain the status quo, and am comfortable with the current compromises we make. We already trade with the EU on better terms than you described, how could it possibly change my view?

Watching Newsnight filled me with dread. The Tory independents veering to voting for the deal. A growing number of Labour MPs in leave constituencies indicating similarly.


https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/pro-brexit-mps-represent-remain-constituencies-509736 I've totted up those constituencies that voted over 52% remain with Leave supporting MPs 25 of which 19 were Tories including Grayling, Rabb, Redwood and Brady. I doubt whether any of those will reject the bid so no reciprocity there. And Hooey of course as the most notable of Labour. Ouch.


Got this off BBC comments - incredibly patronising/superior etc but amused me


Brexit really is like watching your library being burned down by people that can't read.

Alternative reading of same poll


https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/channel-5-comres-poll-on-brexit-1-6325932



Even then, the poll is showing how people respond in the face of politicians and media largely buying the govt line - a deal is possible which will benefit the country


When the reality hits, like the iraq war, you won't be able to find anyone who supported it

Off topic I know but I supported the Iraq war


It?s no use slagging off Brendan O?Neill above if you supported Sadam Hussien


Back on topic - why are Remainers whinging about Boris? crap deal when the surrender Act sent Boris in to negotiate with the EU like a trussed up chlorinated chicken?

keano77 Wrote:


>

> Back on topic - why are Remainers whinging about

> Boris? crap deal when the surrender Act sent Boris

> in to negotiate with the EU like a trussed up

> chlorinated chicken?


Possibly because Remainers want to remain, and don't wish a 'no-deal' arrangement imposed on the country by the hard right Tories.

All remainers are supporters of Saddam Hussein? What tosh. The west did a great job of supporting him, and the disaster of the second Gulf War will be there for decades. Not a simple case of a despot that needed removing or else we'd invade China, North Korea, Russia, Syria and numerous other countries


That nonsense falls sort of some of even some of the rabid comments on the BBC website.


Happy to have a chat about geopolitics anytime. Not sure how aligning ourselves to Trump will do any good for world stability. What did the Romans ever do for us eh?


Here is a brilliant history lesson:


 

keano77 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Off topic I know but I supported the Iraq war

>

> It?s no use slagging off Brendan O?Neill above if

> you supported Sadam Hussien

>


Goes right back to the first Gulf War - and that was Iraq versus Iran in the 1980s


Everything then was a chess game between the West and the Soviet Union.

Where'd you get the bag Dom ?


"An independent publisher which celebrates forgotten female authors said it is "devastated" after pictures emerged of Dominic Cummings carrying on its tote bags."


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/independent-book-publisher-devastated-after-dominic-cummings-is-pictured-carrying-its-tote-bag-a4269566.html

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm guessing they're busy. I found out just now that the SNT has tracked down the kids who attacked my dog, had strong words with their parents, and the gang has now broken up. I got a lot of detail, which I won't go into here, but it sounds as if they were also quite compassionate towards some of the kids, who came from less than optimal backgrounds, shall we say.  I know that those kids had nothing to do with the attack of the man in August and that they are also aware of the fireworks problem. Sounds like good community policing. 
    • I'd rather go to actual local Safer Neighbourhood Team meetings and see the whites of their eyes.  Ours in Peckham Rye Park ward (maps of areas the ward covers are on the police website; no idea about the new one!) used to be very well attended, but sadly now not so.  The local police of the SNT seem to change far too regularly so they never have a chance to really know the area and the people.  And the last meeting, held at the Tenants Hall of Brenchley Gardens (so right on the edge of the geographical area), was held with one day's notice.  Not good.
    • Friends of Peckham Rye Park sent emails to its members (do join if you can; it's useful) saying a few nights ago a fire was started on the SE22 side of the park by kids with fireworks.  Horrific.  
    • No One Said It  Was  However spending money you haven't got and increasing national debt is not a great way to run a country now is it ? Or has common sense left you 🤔 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...