Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


Im a mum of three living in Borough. My eldest is 3 and youngest is 6 weeks. I was lucky enough to be offered a nursery place (full time) for my son at an excellent school in the area. I formally accepted the offer. during my pregnancy with the youngest there were complecations so decided to go back to Australia to have the baby. We wrote to the school and informed them that my son would have to start three weeks late. We didnt hear back from the school and thus assumed that this would be fine. My son was due to start school a few days ago. We dressed him in the uniform and took him to school. He was really excited. On arrival after I informed the office staff that it was my sons first day the Head approached me and said that the place had been given to someone else and that we had been informed of this! She said that she had written to me but I had definately not received any letter. When I asked for a copy of the letter I was informed that she did not have time as she had another parent to see. All this went on in the school hall for all to hear. I was crying and my little one was upset as we had been talking about him starting school for 3 months!


Basically I wanted to know if the school is legally able to do this.


thanks for your time

Monique

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15707-nursery-offer-retracted/
Share on other sites

I'm so sorry that you've gone through this. I went through something a little similar with my first as the nursery I had lined up went into liquidation 2 weeks before i went back to work (a new job) and a week before she was due to start. It's completely horrid and turns your life upside down.


It sounds incredibly out of order that they didn't give you the consideration of taking you into a quiet part (??) of the nursery to discuss this.


I agree, ask the Head for an appointment, if you don't feel you've been given due courtesy after this, then you can talk to Ofsted. Not a particularly nice way to go - but they are the regulating body.


On another note - our nursery is wonderful and I think they may have places. Not sure which area you need/want. But PM me if you are interested. I promise the Head will be lovely to you - whatever you decide.

It may have been an idea to have rung the nursery to check that they had recieved your letter. Although I know Hindsight is a great thing.

have you thought about looking for another nursery? annoying, but if the head is going to act so unprofessionally I would consider another option.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...